Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2016, 02:01 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,561,102 times
Reputation: 2207

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Boeing has already been down this path a few times.

First there was the Boeing 733 from the late 1950s. Mostly design studies.

Boeing won the SST design competition and goverment funding to morph the 733 into the Boeing 2707. It would have carried 3x the number of passengers as the Concord at faster speeds and longer range. Congress killed funding due to environmental concerns and Boeing didn't to do it on its own even though there were orders for it. The project died in the 1970s.

Boeing tried it again with the Sonic Cruiser in the late 1990s. This plane was not faster than sound, but would fly just under it at Mach .98. The project was canceled in 2002 because the airlines were not interested. Bit of a shame on that. It was a nice looking plane. Some of what was developed for that project ended up in the Dreamliner.

Unless there is some sort of huge change in thinking among the MBAs running the airlines, I don't see a new supersonic plane coming off the drawing board for the foreseeable future.
Wow Waldo you're giving me surprises man

First i learned you voted Clinton and Gore and now aviation.

Keep it coming
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2016, 02:59 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,561,102 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
ahh the good old XB49, too bad it wasnt a stable platform, especially for bombing. with its modern avionics, the B2 is a much better aircraft.
And can you believe this beauty was built just after WW2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 03:15 PM
 
31,927 posts, read 27,017,781 times
Reputation: 24826
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Boeing has already been down this path a few times.

First there was the Boeing 733 from the late 1950s. Mostly design studies.

Boeing won the SST design competition and goverment funding to morph the 733 into the Boeing 2707. It would have carried 3x the number of passengers as the Concord at faster speeds and longer range. Congress killed funding due to environmental concerns and Boeing didn't to do it on its own even though there were orders for it. The project died in the 1970s.

Boeing tried it again with the Sonic Cruiser in the late 1990s. This plane was not faster than sound, but would fly just under it at Mach .98. The project was canceled in 2002 because the airlines were not interested. Bit of a shame on that. It was a nice looking plane. Some of what was developed for that project ended up in the Dreamliner.

Unless there is some sort of huge change in thinking among the MBAs running the airlines, I don't see a new supersonic plane coming off the drawing board for the foreseeable future.


GD tree-huggers ruin everything!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_2707
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 03:25 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,561,102 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by bugsypal View Post
gd tree-huggers ruin everything!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/boeing_2707
gd??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 03:34 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,937,825 times
Reputation: 12440
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
gd??
golly darn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 03:42 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,561,102 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11thHour View Post
golly darn
Jesus Christ

You guys can write it you know
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 04:28 PM
 
31,927 posts, read 27,017,781 times
Reputation: 24826
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
Jesus Christ

You guys can write it you know

If you think that is what I meant, I've got this bridge I want to sell....


Now don't spread this around, but it is a landmark and crosses the East River into Brooklyn.... Tell you what I'm going to do... Since you seem like a nice guy.... *LOL*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 04:30 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,561,102 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
If you think that is what I meant, I've got this bridge I want to sell....


Now don't spread this around, but it is a landmark and crosses the East River into Brooklyn.... Tell you what I'm going to do... Since you seem like a nice guy.... *LOL*
Nope i got you but you can post it here i believe

Though i was banned like a day for something very minor.

Best to be careful
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 10:18 PM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,583,156 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Unless there is some sort of huge change in thinking among the MBAs running the airlines, I don't see a new supersonic plane coming off the drawing board for the foreseeable future.


Look which plane has the old BA Concorde flight numbers. It's an A318, the so called "baby bus", which is configured with 8 rows by 4 seats, 20" wide and 72" pitch. They take off from JFK and land at London City airport, where quick customs put you minutes from the business center in London. On return they stop at Shannon Airport in Ireland, where the plane can refuel and the passengers can get out and pass through US customs, saving them the fight at JFK. I can book a flight this week for $14K round trip.

Why should the airlines risk a small fortune on developing supersonic aircraft. They can develop custom flights with lavish luxuries and people will pay sizeable fares.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 10:39 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,863,645 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
And can you believe this beauty was built just after WW2
actually yes i can, considering that the original prototype was built DURING world war two. do you know which aircraft that was, and why it was built?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top