Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2010, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244

Advertisements

Thank You.

Quote:
Members of California's largest state employee union approved a contract Tuesday that cuts pay by nearly 5 percent for 95,000 government workers and rolls back pension benefits, a move that will protect them from more sweeping government furloughs.
Largest Calif. Employee Union OKs Pension Changes - ABC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2010, 08:11 PM
 
4,803 posts, read 10,175,796 times
Reputation: 2785
Thank god.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 08:24 PM
 
1,963 posts, read 5,623,744 times
Reputation: 1648
SEIU leaders are thinking strategically... now if only prison/law enforcement & firefighter unions do the same we'll start on the road back to fiscal sanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Riverside
4,088 posts, read 4,388,688 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Many law enforcement agencies in Ca (including ours) agreed to voluntary reductions in retirement benefits for new hirees in their negotiations this year. Officers hired after the new contracts are ratified must work to age 55 (instead of 50) to qualify for full retirement. Additionally, they will be responsible for contributing an additional 3% of their salaries to their Cal Pers retirement account (an amount previously covered by the city).

The California Highway Patrol agreed to similar reforms this year. The one to watch is the CCPOA (Ca Corrections Ofcs). Last I heard, they were holding the line.

I know, 50 years old (or even 55) may sound awfully young to retire, but we're talking about cops here. Trust me, a 50 year old officer with 20+ years of service (the minimum required for retirement under Pers) is generally going to be a pretty beat-up dude. The job does take a toll.

Just some things to think about, next time you hear someone talking about the evil, unreasonable California Public Employee's unions. We see the need for reform too, and are working toward it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 10:19 PM
 
6,497 posts, read 11,816,936 times
Reputation: 11124
It sounds like most changes will affect new hires, so there'll be no REAL benefit for about what....20 years? yeah, that helps us now... not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 11:38 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
You decide:

http://www.dpa.ca.gov/pv_obj_cache/p...07-summary.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 04:59 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,283,089 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Now most are only overpaid 275% compared to the private sector.
Plus we have a 500 billion in the hole to deal with regarding their retirements which are also not found anywhere in the private sector.

BUT, private sector taxes is what pays for all their lottery type earnings and benefits in government employment.

Start by getting rid of half of them IMO.
Leave the cops and fire people alone, but don't allow pensions based on last years wages, should be some reasonable amount with their SS at 67 like everyone else in the real world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 06:53 PM
 
2,654 posts, read 5,466,656 times
Reputation: 1946
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
Many law enforcement agencies in Ca (including ours) agreed to voluntary reductions in retirement benefits for new hirees in their negotiations this year. Officers hired after the new contracts are ratified must work to age 55 (instead of 50) to qualify for full retirement. Additionally, they will be responsible for contributing an additional 3% of their salaries to their Cal Pers retirement account (an amount previously covered by the city).

The California Highway Patrol agreed to similar reforms this year. The one to watch is the CCPOA (Ca Corrections Ofcs). Last I heard, they were holding the line.

I know, 50 years old (or even 55) may sound awfully young to retire, but we're talking about cops here. Trust me, a 50 year old officer with 20+ years of service (the minimum required for retirement under Pers) is generally going to be a pretty beat-up dude. The job does take a toll.

Just some things to think about, next time you hear someone talking about the evil, unreasonable California Public Employee's unions. We see the need for reform too, and are working toward it.
A 5% cut in a 80-90% of pre retirement pay pension isn't exactly spilling blood. Of course that only covers new hires so this will help us in, say, 2040 or so. Does'nt do much before then.

When I see 30 year cops getting the same benefits as 30 year retired military - 66% of base pay with no OT "spiking" etc. - for current employees more then 10 years from retirement AND future hires then I'll agree the public safety unions are serious about solving this states fiscal problem.

This looks like a fig leaf so they can argue that they are giving something up to when in fact they are just doing the bare minimum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 08:55 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokingGun View Post
SEIU leaders are thinking strategically... now if only prison/law enforcement & firefighter unions do the same we'll start on the road back to fiscal sanity.
Agreed. I've been saying this about police/firefighters/prison guards for a long time. They've been demanding (and getting) more and more over the last 15 years or so, much more than the other public sector unions. They really miliked the 9/11 disaster for all it was worth. It's time for them to realize they don't get to live in a different financial reality than the rest of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 08:59 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
Now most are only overpaid 275% compared to the private sector.
Ok, your point is well taken but no need for the extreme hyperbole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top