Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:29 PM
 
364 posts, read 611,212 times
Reputation: 620

Advertisements

A good idea - sorta. In CA deregulation come in the form of regulation. Would have been better if the legislature had just stayed out of it altogether and let the connection services operate on their own. But it is CA afterall and this is better than nothing:

California becomes first state in nation to regulate ride-sharing - latimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2013, 10:25 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,822,024 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine7793 View Post
A good idea - sorta. In CA deregulation come in the form of regulation. Would have been better if the legislature had just stayed out of it altogether and let the connection services operate on their own. But it is CA afterall and this is better than nothing:

California becomes first state in nation to regulate ride-sharing - latimes.com
It is just proof that the only thing ca government hates more than being green is someone messing with their pocket book (taxes).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 08:12 AM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,266,415 times
Reputation: 3387
As a strong free-market supporter, I have to say this came out better than I thought. The ride-share companies all like it as well. They were facing backlash from taxi companies that were pressuring cities (most notably Los Angeles) to outlaw the ride-share companies because of a lot of made up dangers.

This is the nut of the regulation (from the article)

Quote:
Regulators would require drivers to undergo criminal background checks, receive driver training, follow a zero-tolerance policy on drugs and alcohol and carry insurance policies with a minimum of $1 million in liability coverage.
Common sense stuff but now the cities won't be able to outlaw the practice so easily. Big win for ride-share companies and big win for California. I feel all states will do something similar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top