Quote:
Originally Posted by Oildog
Uhhh...I'll type this slowly...The 'debate' over gay marriage is much more about finance than what is morally right and wrong. When a man and woman become 'married', there are all sorts of legal/healthcare/insurance benefits the spouse becomes entitled too. These do not necessarily go to a 'domestic partner'. Which is why many companies specify spouse AND domestic partner benefits. Morality is a great shield to hide behind.
As this forum is about celebrities I won't continue to debate this on this forum.
|
I started a simple congratulatory thread....YOU......now read SLOWLY....turned it into the POC DRAMA!!!!!
And I disagree with your premise, since finance issues in marriage are debatable. Is it cheaper to have a gay couple live together and support each other as they age....or is it cheaper to send folks to Nursing Homes before it's necessary...I'm a Nurse......I see this problem on a daily basis.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
. I wish the couple well but wonder if Doogie is on tap for alimony if they split now? Just like M/F weddings where one spouse has more $$$ than the other.
