Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-21-2020, 12:24 PM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,568,408 times
Reputation: 7783

Advertisements

I was always told that solar chargers for cell phones are not very reliable. However, the newer cell phones have a c-type USB port that permits up to 100 watts instead of 5 watts like the old micro USB ports.

Does that make them quicker to charge and hence a solar charger more efficient?

I see this new ad for $100 solar charger with a C-type USB connection. Is it worth it?
https://litsolar.com/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2020, 12:42 PM
 
Location: McAllen, TX
5,947 posts, read 5,479,098 times
Reputation: 6747
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoMartin View Post
I was always told that solar chargers for cell phones are not very reliable. However, the newer cell phones have a c-type USB port that permits up to 100 watts instead of 5 watts like the old micro USB ports.

Does that make them quicker to charge and hence a solar charger more efficient?

I see this new ad for $100 solar charger with a C-type USB connection. Is it worth it?
https://litsolar.com/
Charging the powerbank varies anywhere from 8 hours with a wall plug to 80 hours via solar.

What affects the speed of charging your phone from the powerbank are the amps, not watts.

Typically a 2A charger or better is considered a "fast" charger.

The type-c charger listed on the page is rated as a Quickcharge 3.0 charger providing up to 2.5A. It will fast charge most devices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2020, 12:54 PM
 
14,394 posts, read 11,252,791 times
Reputation: 14163
It's also generally better to use a solar charger to charge up a battery, and then use that to charge the phone, as opposed to charging a phone directly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
2,743 posts, read 4,828,538 times
Reputation: 3949
Make sure you look at any solar charger's rated Time To Charge examples. Most people VASTLY overrate the actual power available from solar.
The link you provides shows an 8.5 hour time frame to charge a 10k bank, but doesn't say how much less to charge the on-board 2k bank.
This means such devices are probably useful if you will be off-grid for days, but if you're where a wall outlet is handy, that will always be much faster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2020, 11:21 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,882 posts, read 25,154,836 times
Reputation: 19083
It's just a normal battery pack with small solar panel. They typically take around 4 days to charge assuming it's a decent panel. So if you can leave it sitting there for four days to charge that's fairly useful. E.g., if you're off grid and set it on a rock that gets direct sunlight all day during the day it will charge enough to bring it inside and charge up a cell phone from empty to full at night.

On the other hand a normal 20,000 mAh battery pack that you charge by off a wall socket is 20 or 30 bucks. You can just charge that overnight and it's good for 4 or 5 charges on a normal cellphone. For most people that's more useful. Of course you can charge the solar one off an outlet too but then is it worth spending an extra 70 or 80 bucks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top