Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As a neurosurgeon, I did not believe in the phenomenon of near-death experiences. I grew up in a scientific world, the son of a neurosurgeon. I followed my father’s path and became an academic neurosurgeon, teaching at Harvard Medical School and other universities. I understand what happens to the brain when people are near death, and I had always believed there were good scientific explanations for the heavenly out-of-body journeys described by those who narrowly escaped death.
As a neurosurgeon, I did not believe in the phenomenon of near-death experiences. I grew up in a scientific world, the son of a neurosurgeon. I followed my father’s path and became an academic neurosurgeon, teaching at Harvard Medical School and other universities. I understand what happens to the brain when people are near death, and I had always believed there were good scientific explanations for the heavenly out-of-body journeys described by those who narrowly escaped death.
This doctor's experience over 7 days mirrors my experiences in deep meditation over 40+ years but for much shorter durations. His experiences were far more visual than mine (I have always lacked the ability to visualize). I cannot therefore confirm his visual descriptions of anything. The multiple personalities/entities (what I experience as a multitude or crowd) all unified in a oneness captures my sense of it as well. It has always been very difficult for me to verbalize or characterize the experiences . . . because as he eloquently describes it . . . it is not through language or thought as we know it . . . but through "knowing" in a much more direct and intimate way. His description of the communication process (equivalent to questions and answers) is again direct . . . not involving the normal processes we are familiar with. But everything . . . including the questions/answers . . . are unequivocal and unmistakable with a "knowing" and certainty unobtainable in our daily life here. I do not know him nor do I have any way to confirm his story or credentials. But his descriptions track so closely to my experiences, I am confident that he genuinely experienced them.
Ah, NDE's, that some people take as proof of an afterlife. Well here's the thing. What supposedly entered the heavenly realm upon their 'near death?' Their soul, correct? But their brain, ie their memory, did no such thing. So tell me, how would a person, upon coming back from the brink, remember what their soul experienced? Their bodies memory is a purely physical phenomenon. We all agree that is it a function of our brain, right? I no way whatsoever did their brain accompany their soul on this journey, nor see what their soul supposedly saw, but somehow is able to recall what their soul saw? Huh? This to me is just more evidence that all these NDE's are purely a result of the process of the brain dying, thus why their brain is able to remember these visions, as it actually experienced the chemical processes that caused them.
Ah, NDE's, that some people take as proof of an afterlife. Well here's the thing. What supposedly entered the heavenly realm upon their 'near death?' Their soul, correct? But their brain, ie their memory, did no such thing. So tell me, how would a person, upon coming back from the brink, remember what their soul experienced? Their bodies memory is a purely physical phenomenon. We all agree that is it a function of our brain, right? I no way whatsoever did their brain accompany their soul on this journey, nor see what their soul supposedly saw, but somehow is able to recall what their soul saw? Huh? This to me is just more evidence that all these NDE's are purely a result of the process of the brain dying, thus why their brain is able to remember these visions, as it actually experienced the chemical processes that caused them.
How do you explain all of the accounts of people watching what happened to their bodies and giving specific details etc.?
Also, you bring up a good question about the brain/spirit. You said that the bodies memory is a purely physical phenomenon. But who is to say that the spirit does not retain memory? This is a stupid analogy, but I'm rushed for time, it's almost as if the body/brain is an old fashioned telephone and the spirit is a cell phone. The spirit does not need to be wired into the body, just as a cell phone does not need to be wired into the wall in order to function. Perhaps our spirits are who we REALLY are and this body/brain is just a necessary clunky old vehicle that we must ride around in until it becomes "obsolete" when we die and our spirits are set free.
While the brain is unbelievably complex and intricate, maybe it cannot even compare to the complexity of our spirit? Of course, we can't measure the spirit, we can't take it out and look at it and study it. (And I know some/many will say "we don't even know if the spirit even exists!!" I know.. I get that argument, trust me. lol. I'm just putting some ideas out there.)
Another thing that makes me wonder, is with some supernatural experiences, perhaps it is not our physical brain experiencing but rather our spirit. Some have seen "angels" (or spirit beings or whatever you want to call them) on occasion, for instance. Perhaps it was their spirit that was overriding their brain in that moment in time that saw the "angel". hmmmmm. Well, just pondering here..
I could dismiss every single NDE as pure trash were it not for "scientifically verified" evidence that thousands of these people were able to recount exact details of what went on and who said what in the operating room when they were hooked up to every monitoring device imaginable showing their pulse (zero) heartbeat (zero) brainwave (flat) blood oxygenation (non-existent)--in other words "deader than a doornail". If atheist doctors are convinced by these events that something is going on beyond the realm of our physical world that's good enough for me and for millions of others.
Feeble retorts like, "It was their brain producing these visions" is even more ridiculous than what the skeptics claim is ridiculous.
If you get impatient with the video below just jump to minute 7:00. That's where it really gets interesting.
NDE's are indeed fascinating, but, how is it that a doctor's assurance of heaven is required to persuade some people.... but, God's Word is not sufficient??
If so, where then does one's 'faith' lie? .... in human wisdom -- or in God?
NDE's are indeed fascinating, but, how is it that a doctor's assurance of heaven is required to persuade some people.... but, God's Word is not sufficient??
If so, where then does one's 'faith' lie? .... in human wisdom -- or in God?
Quite simply because God's Word is so abstract that most ordinary people cannot relate to it, but they CAN relate to a physician's objective description of a supernatural event without any BS religious personal convictions bleeding into the description of events.
Maurice Rawlings was a perfect example of a Dr. who tried to use his position of power to push his own personal religious agenda of eternal torment. Consequently, nearly all of the stories in his books have been discredited as fabrications or pure hokum. He was on a mission to save people from the horrible fate he believed waits for sinners beyond this life and thought that lies justified the end, namely saving people from eternal hellfire.
Personal experience will do more than a million 'doctor's studies'.
There is something more...what it is...I do not know.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.