Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-22-2017, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Cannes
2,452 posts, read 2,380,546 times
Reputation: 1620

Advertisements

I am wondering which city in the West would have the volume and concentration of skyscrapers like Chicago? Or one that would at least come close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2017, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
456 posts, read 774,428 times
Reputation: 331
Strictly speaking the answer to your question is neither city has the volume or concentration of Chicago nor comes that close. Another way of saying the same thing is that both are (much) more similar to each other than to Chicago. Obviously Chicago is much bigger than either one (and has historically loved building iconic skyscrapers) and so will have a larger volume of skyscrapers. But the residential high rise chain along Lake Michigan to my mind makes its built form much different than cities that cluster their high rises in the core. Its not always visually apparent but Seattle is about 80% the population size of S.F. and the high rise core of both are in roughly similar ratios.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2017, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,884,402 times
Reputation: 3419
Seattle and SF have far less space to work with. Also, in the case of Seattle, strict height limits at the skyline’s current edges means that while Seattle will grow denser, the skyline will not grow outward much besides a few towers going up near Denny Way, the furthest north any of the towers will go. The more visually dramatic skyline changes are going to be in the University Distrcit and in Bellevue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2017, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Chicago- Hyde Park
4,079 posts, read 10,393,276 times
Reputation: 2658
Agreed neither, the terrain is a draw back
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2017, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Cannes
2,452 posts, read 2,380,546 times
Reputation: 1620
always wondered why we don't have similar to Chicago, Philly etc on the West.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2017, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,915,941 times
Reputation: 7419
Chicago has a little over 1200 high rises while SF has a little over 450 and Seattle is around 225. Kind of apples to oranges BUT if you had to pick between the two it would clearly be SF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2017, 06:59 PM
 
1,052 posts, read 798,021 times
Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
always wondered why we don't have similar to Chicago, Philly etc on the West.
Of the five big cities on the west coast, San Diego and Seattle have height restrictions due to proximity to airports, LA and SF are in seismically active zones, and Portland, well, is Portland with somewhat arbitrary limits on building heights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2017, 07:00 PM
 
8,859 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
SF is nearly the same size, but it has multiple urban cores vs. one that totally dominates. Seattle is half the size of either.

SF has a substantially larger "greater downtown area" than Seattle, and it's booming. Seattle's is growing much faster however.

Seattle's greater downtown area is similar to Chicago's. Both have historically had a lot of underused sites in all directions, and still do despite the majority having gone away in the last couple decades. Related to that, both have substantial geographic dispersal of construction while SF's is heavily weighted toward wide area to the south. Seattle has some of SF's multiple-core aspect (Bellevue, Tacoma, U District), but its Silicon Valley equivalent (Redmond and Bellevue) is closer in and smaller than the main core. All three cores serve every aspect of a good downtown -- shopping, tourism, residents, tons of office workers, etc.

It's not an easy comparison. But overall, SF would be Chicago's peer on urbanity (less on scale) and Seattle a bit more in some other regards (way less scale).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2017, 07:14 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Not in the west but long stretch of high rises along the water in Miami would be closest

Neither SF nor Seattle come close to Chicago on high rises

If anything Seatlle would seem somewhere between Boston and Baltimore as a better comparator

SF Boston or Philly

Just left Seattle today. Lots of construction. But stillcatching up and drops off right outside of the DT more so than any of the others

Did do the Link from airport and the S L U T to hutch from its terminus and back for a meeting. Got see the Amazon complex a bit

Seattle kind of felt like Austin meets SF in a way but more interesting than Austin and way better scenery

Lots of decent infill in Belltown and SLU

Last edited by kidphilly; 09-22-2017 at 07:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top