Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: most urban?
SF 167 31.87%
LA 71 13.55%
DC 45 8.59%
Philly 165 31.49%
Boston 76 14.50%
Voters: 524. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2011, 07:50 PM
 
14,028 posts, read 15,037,335 times
Reputation: 10471

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Nope you are missing the point, I would not say that any of these cities are outwordly friendly, not the point at all

I will speculate that you are young and have not experienced all to a great extent. Boston has many exceptional attributes but like all cities has areas where it excels and does not
I understand the Philly/DC arguments which have rowhomes and taking that over Boston/SF with prodominatly Victorians/Triple deckers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2011, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia,New Jersey, NYC!
6,963 posts, read 20,544,666 times
Reputation: 2737
you guys are nuts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:05 AM
 
815 posts, read 1,859,178 times
Reputation: 522
lol, all things aside, Boston is absolutely more uptight, and it's cultural not the transplants. DC is uptight, and it's the transplants not cultural. Philly and NYC are both more anything goes. This has nothing to do with "pace of life" btw.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:13 AM
 
815 posts, read 1,859,178 times
Reputation: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Uhh same with NYC and Chicago - megacities tend to have sprawling suburbs.
Actually no. LA has more suburban build up than both NYC AND Chicago, w/o the urban core/public transit/etc. Do you think nobody has visited LA, Chicago and NYC? The difference is obvious. Now if you were trying to tout how Salt Lake City is or some other irrelevant place that maybe not many people have been to, I could see you trying to slip such comments under the rug outside of analysis...We all know your game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 10:23 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,946,875 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garfieldian View Post
lol, all things aside, Boston is absolutely more uptight, and it's cultural not the transplants. DC is uptight, and it's the transplants not cultural. Philly and NYC are both more anything goes. This has nothing to do with "pace of life" btw.

Agree with all you say and the impact to pace of life as well
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,114 posts, read 34,747,185 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garfieldian View Post
lol, all things aside, Boston is absolutely more uptight, and it's cultural not the transplants. DC is uptight, and it's the transplants not cultural. Philly and NYC are both more anything goes. This has nothing to do with "pace of life" btw.
I don't know if I agree with this. Many people think of Boston as a blue blood, aristocratic town, but it's very much a surly, blue-collar town. Much like Philadelphia in that sense. I don't think "uptight" is how I would describe the culture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,865,506 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garfieldian View Post
Actually no. LA has more suburban build up than both NYC AND Chicago, w/o the urban core/public transit/etc. Do you think nobody has visited LA, Chicago and NYC? The difference is obvious. Now if you were trying to tout how Salt Lake City is or some other irrelevant place that maybe not many people have been to, I could see you trying to slip such comments under the rug outside of analysis...We all know your game.
No game here sir...

Well first of all I was responding to a poster that said it takes too long to get out of Los Angeles and into more rural areas. I am pretty sure if you started in Midtown Manhattan or the Loop in Chicago, it would take you a great deal of time to drive out to a rural area.

I agree there is nowhere in CHI or NYC like the Inland Empire in Southern California.

Los Angeles has a very urban core and has a decent, constantly growing PT system. It can't stand up to CHI or NYC but it is still very effective and gets me everywhere I need to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 10:35 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,249,261 times
Reputation: 6767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garfieldian View Post
Actually no. LA has more suburban build up than both NYC AND Chicago, w/o the urban core/public transit/etc. Do you think nobody has visited LA, Chicago and NYC? The difference is obvious. Now if you were trying to tout how Salt Lake City is or some other irrelevant place that maybe not many people have been to, I could see you trying to slip such comments under the rug outside of analysis...We all know your game.
I'm living in Los Angeles without a car right now and I get around just fine. I think public transportation in L.A. is pretty good. Much better than I ever expected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2011, 02:12 PM
 
129 posts, read 264,524 times
Reputation: 57
LA can compete with Phildephia if you take the county into perspective then LA has 9 million peole. Im not sure if MAlibu is in LA country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2011, 02:16 PM
 
14,028 posts, read 15,037,335 times
Reputation: 10471
Just saying, LA should be winning,i made a mistake by voting for Boston, LA has an urban Downtown with a huge area of moderate urbanitity.
but Philly wins every poll in existance, there could be a
"what is the capital of Massachusetts?" poll and Philly would win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top