Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-16-2011, 01:39 AM
 
Location: Seattle Area
617 posts, read 1,424,538 times
Reputation: 353

Advertisements

Is the Los Angeles CSA really bigger than the entire state of South Carolina and I have even heard Georgia? From looking at a population map I don't see it but I might be wrong here is a link to the LA csa:
California Population Map | California Maps

What do you guys think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2011, 06:42 AM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,872,540 times
Reputation: 2698
I'm more than certain it's not bigger than both states in terms of land area, but in terms of population, the Los Angeles CSA is indeed more populous than the states of SC and GA combined.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtownboogie View Post
Is the Los Angeles CSA really bigger than the entire state of South Carolina and I have even heard Georgia? From looking at a population map I don't see it but I might be wrong here is a link to the LA csa:
California Population Map | California Maps

What do you guys think?
Its not really a matter of opinion.

The LA CSA has about 30,000 sq miles which is about the same size as South Carolina. Georgia has 57,000 sq miles.

And that map you picked really dispells the huge myth that LA is spread out over 30,000 square miles. Fact is, most people in LA are concentrated in the southwestern part of the CSA. Most of the CSA is totally undeveloped.

Last edited by 18Montclair; 04-16-2011 at 09:26 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 09:01 AM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,171 posts, read 13,253,306 times
Reputation: 10141
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Its not really a matter of opinion.

The LA CSA has about 30,000 sq miles which is about the same size as North Carolina. Georgia has 57,000 sq miles.

And that map you picked really dispells the huge myth that LA is spread out over 30,000 square miles. Fact is, most people in LA are concentrated in the southwestern part of the CSA. Most of the CSA is totally undeveloped.
I think you mean South Carolina.

North Carolina is the bigger sister.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 09:03 AM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,872,540 times
Reputation: 2698
Right. SC is about 32K sq mi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
I think you mean South Carolina.

North Carolina is the bigger sister.
LOL thanks. That's what I meant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC (in my mind)
7,943 posts, read 17,256,347 times
Reputation: 4686
Only the far western portions of San Bernardino and Riverside counties are urbanized. I think its kind of ridiculous that the entire county is included in the Los Angeles CSA when the eastern sides are much closer to Las Vegas than Los Angeles, plus that being totally undeveloped (not just rural, but completely desolate of civilization).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Weymouth, The South
785 posts, read 1,882,988 times
Reputation: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
Only the far western portions of San Bernardino and Riverside counties are urbanized. I think its kind of ridiculous that the entire county is included in the Los Angeles CSA when the eastern sides are much closer to Las Vegas than Los Angeles, plus that being totally undeveloped (not just rural, but completely desolate of civilization).
Well it's not ridiculous, that CSA has to be constructed the same way as any other, it just happens that those two are pretty large counties. I'm sure one day someone'll make a good case for them to be redrawn, but at the moment, annoyingly, the CSA will seem way less dense than it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 11:30 PM
 
31 posts, read 62,791 times
Reputation: 20
LA is larger than south carolina with 87,000 km2 and a population of nearly 20,500,000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 11:41 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by losangeles123 View Post
LA is larger than south carolina with 87,000 km2 and a population of nearly 20,500,000
Er, according to the 2010 Census, the LA CSA had 17,877,006.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top