Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-19-2011, 11:03 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,906,553 times
Reputation: 7976

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
The difference between Westchester and Nassau may be suprising to New Yorkers. I colored the Long Island ones blue (almost all Nassau County except for Old Field and Lloyd Harbor) and Westchester County orange.

However, #72 "East Meadows" cannot be right??? East Meadow(s) is just a regular middle class suburb in central Nassau.
Interesting, My issue with LI is that it is about the hardest place in America to actually get to. I can get from Center City Philly to BK in like an hour and a half and it takes the same amount time to get through BK and Queens
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2011, 12:47 PM
 
Location: North by Northwest
9,328 posts, read 13,001,014 times
Reputation: 6174
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Interesting, My issue with LI is that it is about the hardest place in America to actually get to. I can get from Center City Philly to BK in like an hour and a half and it takes the same amount time to get through BK and Queens
LI also has a lot of towns, however wealthy, that seem to be made up exclusively of tract housing and strip malls (kinda like South Jersey, you know?). Most of those LI suburbs get my full respect though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 01:08 PM
 
29 posts, read 36,541 times
Reputation: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenWood View Post
LI also has a lot of towns, however wealthy, that seem to be made up exclusively of tract housing and strip malls (kinda like South Jersey, you know?). Most of those LI suburbs get my full respect though.
Really? I would say that LI has basically less tract housing/strip malls than any suburban region in the U.S. Maybe only Westchester County has less sprawly stuff.

LI is built around the LIRR, which is, by far, the busiest suburban rail network in the U.S. The towns sprung up along the LIRR, and there are dozens and dozens of downtown areas.

And the wealthiest parts of Long Island have basically no tract homes or strip malls. The North Shore and the Hamptons (the two weathiest areas) don't really have either. They just have huge homes on heavily wooded lots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 01:16 PM
 
Location: North by Northwest
9,328 posts, read 13,001,014 times
Reputation: 6174
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan22 View Post
Really? I would say that LI has basically less tract housing/strip malls than any suburban region in the U.S. Maybe only Westchester County has less sprawly stuff.

LI is built around the LIRR, which is, by far, the busiest suburban rail network in the U.S. The towns sprung up along the LIRR, and there are dozens and dozens of downtown areas.

And the wealthiest parts of Long Island have basically no tract homes or strip malls. The North Shore and the Hamptons (the two weathiest areas) don't really have either. They just have huge homes on heavily wooded lots.
The nicest parts of Long Island definitely fit your description (mostly the more rural and/or historical towns). But from what I've seen, a lot of the newer towns--namely the ones that owe their start to the post-WWII explosion in suburban settlement--seem to be riddled with it. Granted, I'm mostly referring to Western Long Island. A lot of these more recent, upper-middle-class enclaves, remind me of Cherry Hill, NJ area if you've ever been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 01:38 PM
 
Location: MIA/DC
1,190 posts, read 2,252,512 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
However, #72 "East Meadows" cannot be right??? East Meadow(s) is just a regular middle class suburb in central Nassau.
It depends on what they used as its boundaries. East Meadow isn't a municipality, town, or village but is unincorporated census designated place which don't have defined boundaries. They likely didn't use the whole area but some of the more expensive areas in the CDP of East Meadows
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 03:20 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,499,960 times
Reputation: 21229
This is based on old data cause the 2010 census income stats for cities with less than 65,000 have not been released yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 03:35 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, north TX
425 posts, read 995,493 times
Reputation: 285
What about Westlake, TX - it's not on the list for metropolitan Dallas/Fort Worth, whereas Southlake is?

https://www.city-data.com/city/Westlake-Texas.html

Median household income in Westlake is $251,814. Median house price is $1.055million. Surely that should rank somewhere on that list?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 05:51 PM
 
Location: MIA/DC
1,190 posts, read 2,252,512 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatChicagoan View Post
What about Westlake, TX - it's not on the list for metropolitan Dallas/Fort Worth, whereas Southlake is?

https://www.city-data.com/city/Westlake-Texas.html

Median household income in Westlake is $251,814. Median house price is $1.055million. Surely that should rank somewhere on that list?
Westlake doesn't meet the population threshold for the first list of median household income. Many metros have clusters of small towns/villages with extreme wealth but not all meet the population requirements. Southlake however is on the first list and meets the minimum required population
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 06:09 PM
 
100 posts, read 145,313 times
Reputation: 53
Look at the NY area just dominate this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 06:22 PM
 
Location: North by Northwest
9,328 posts, read 13,001,014 times
Reputation: 6174
Quote:
Originally Posted by philynyallday View Post
Look at the NY area just dominate this!
New York's plenty wealthy, but it wouldn't be quite as dominant if the list were adjusted for cost-of-living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top