Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, you do make a good point. I wonder if its the CBD for that Metro are which I assume would be Dallas only
Also, another minor issue I have with these kinds of reports overall, is that unless they take an actual census of every building in the downtown(which is not done btw), its going to be difficult to get a number that is 100% accurate.
So while they are very interesting to see, we must take them with a small grain of salt.
Well, you do make a good point. I wonder if its the CBD for that Metro are which I assume would be Dallas only
Also, another minor issue I have with these kinds of reports overall, is that unless they take an actual census of every building in the downtown(which is not done btw), its going to be difficult to get a number that is 100% accurate.
So while they are very interesting to see, we must take them with a small grain of salt.
Accurate is one thing, but the numbers for Houston are wildly fluctuating. That is a 20M sq ft difference.
wow, so Houston's number actually went down in this study over a year?? Without the demolition of any buildings and with the construction of a new one??? I thought the sq footage goes up when you add a building?
Yeah, Colliers lost major cred there.
Just noticed that ATL went down by 8M sq feet too. How odd
^^^^ These numbers are confusing me. They are totally different on the two lists.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.