Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-12-2012, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,728 posts, read 15,772,368 times
Reputation: 4081

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAReastcoast View Post
In terms of choice riders I still feel Chicago is higher than DC, you are really selling Chicago short. Chicago also has a HUGE population of choice bus riders. The north side of Chicago, is the second most urban area in te country and has a great deal of wealth, it's not the poor riding there.
As a percentage of population dc is clearly ahead.
DC has about 400,000 less total transit riders than Chicago. DC has about 4 million less people than Chicago. How can you say Chicago has more choice riders?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2012, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Chicago(Northside)
3,678 posts, read 7,218,957 times
Reputation: 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAReastcoast View Post
In terms of choice riders I still feel Chicago is higher than DC, you are really selling Chicago short. Chicago also has a HUGE population of choice bus riders. The north side of Chicago, is the second most urban area in te country and has a great deal of wealth, it's not the poor riding there.
As a percentage of population dc is clearly ahead.
Yes considering all D.C. really has is buses and rail and Chicago has a HUGE RAIL, trollys and major bus system, and even boats did i mention that with the transit in chicago they have CTA, metra and armack and of course the train.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,728 posts, read 15,772,368 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAReastcoast View Post
In terms of choice riders I still feel Chicago is higher than DC, you are really selling Chicago short. Chicago also has a HUGE population of choice bus riders. The north side of Chicago, is the second most urban area in te country and has a great deal of wealth, it's not the poor riding there.
As a percentage of population dc is clearly ahead.

American Public Transportation Report For Rail

Q2 2012 Subway Ridership


D.C. Metro Ridership = 1,027,600 daily riders

Chicago EL' Ridership = 737,900 daily riders


Q2 2012 Commuter Rail Ridership

DC MARC Ridership = 36,100 daily riders
DC VRE Ridership = 19,200 daily riders (Q4 2011)

Chicago Metra Ridership = 303,800 daily riders


Total City Rail Ridership

#1 DC Total Rail Ridership = 1,082,900 daily riders **(metro area population = 5,703,948)**

#2 Chicago Total Rail Ridership = 1,041,700 daily riders **(metro area population = 9,461,105)**

Q2 2012 Bus Ridership

DC WMATA Bus System = 440,900 daily riders
DC RIDE ON Bus System = 89,800 daily riders
DC Connector Bus System = 39,200 daily riders

Chicago CTA Bus System = 995,000 daily riders
Chicago PACE Bus System = 108,900 daily riders

Total City Bus Ridership

#1 DC Total Bus Ridership =
569,900 daily riders **(metro area population = 5,703,948)**

#2 Chicago Total Bus Ridership = 1,103,900 daily riders **(metro area population = 9,461,105)**

http://www.apta.com/resources/statis...rship-APTA.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 07:08 PM
 
1,302 posts, read 1,952,648 times
Reputation: 1001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
American Public Transportation Report For Rail

Q2 2012 Subway Ridership


D.C. Metro Ridership = 1,027,600 daily riders

Chicago EL' Ridership = 737,900 daily riders


Q2 2012 Commuter Rail Ridership

DC MARC Ridership = 36,100 daily riders
DC VRE Ridership = 19,200 daily riders (Q4 2011)

Chicago Metra Ridership = 303,800 daily riders


Total City Rail Ridership

#1 DC Total Rail Ridership = 1,082,900 daily riders **(metro area population = 5,703,948)**

#2 Chicago Total Rail Ridership = 1,041,700 daily riders **(metro area population = 9,461,105)**

Q2 2012 Bus Ridership

DC WMATA Bus System = 440,900 daily riders
DC RIDE ON Bus System = 89,800 daily riders
DC Connector Bus System = 39,200 daily riders

Chicago CTA Bus System = 995,000 daily riders
Chicago PACE Bus System = 108,900 daily riders

Total City Bus Ridership

#1 DC Total Bus Ridership =
569,900 daily riders **(metro area population = 5,703,948)**

#2 Chicago Total Bus Ridership = 1,103,900 daily riders **(metro area population = 9,461,105)**

http://www.apta.com/resources/statis...rship-APTA.pdf
Unlike the DC area, only Chicago limits has access to CTA both rail and bus (except for a very few places directly outside the city limits). Using MSA numbers is sort of meaningless.
I'm still not convinced DC has more choice riders, even if every transit rider in DC was a choice rider it is still a decent amount less than Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 07:09 PM
 
4,574 posts, read 7,503,609 times
Reputation: 2613
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
This is a good list for rapid transit only (I would assume for LA you are including the LRT). Although I'm not sure Atlanta's system is busier than Los Angeles'. Boston's T is always really busy, particularly the Green Line - but to compare it with LA, the other system I am familiar with, the buses get nowhere near as busy. Including the bus systems is where LA really catches up to the pack (and where Chicago puts itself in the lead).
Atlanta's heavy rail system has a daily ridership of 223,000 compared to Los Angeles' 155,000, though the system in LA probably would seem busier because it is significantly smaller than MARTA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,728 posts, read 15,772,368 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAReastcoast View Post
Unlike the DC area, only Chicago limits has access to CTA both rail and bus (except for a very few places directly outside the city limits). Using MSA numbers is sort of meaningless.
I'm still not convinced DC has more choice riders, even if every transit rider in DC was a choice rider it is still a decent amount less than Chicago.
I am almost certain Chicago serves a greater percentage of their population by CTA than DC does with WMATA. DC's WMATA serves about 2 million people. Infact, when you really take into account the small area covered by Metro, it's even more staggering that Metro has over 1 million riders while serving such a tiny population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Chicago
303 posts, read 579,599 times
Reputation: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAReastcoast View Post
In terms of choice riders I still feel Chicago is higher than DC, you are really selling Chicago short. Chicago also has a HUGE population of choice bus riders. The north side of Chicago, is the second most urban area in te country and has a great deal of wealth, it's not the poor riding there.
As a percentage of population dc is clearly ahead.
I feel you are selling the whole city of Chicago short. The transit is taken seriously on the South Side as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 07:25 PM
 
1,302 posts, read 1,952,648 times
Reputation: 1001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
I am almost certain Chicago serves a greater percentage of their population by CTA than DC does with WMATA. DC's WMATA serves about 2 million people.
I don't know exact numbers, but Chicago proper is 2.7M, I would guess roughly 200-300k are serviced outside the city. So roughly 3M total.

Obviously Chicagoland is much larger than greater Washington, but the CTA does nothing for people in dupage, lake, will and a good portion of cook county. While those counties have access to metra, I think we can agree most if not all metra riders are choice riders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,865,506 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by nature's message View Post
Atlanta's heavy rail system has a daily ridership of 223,000 compared to Los Angeles' 155,000, though the system in LA probably would seem busier because it is significantly smaller than MARTA.
When you add in the LRT, which is seamlessly part of the transit system, LA's rail ridership is quite a bit larger than Atlanta's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2012, 07:26 PM
 
1,302 posts, read 1,952,648 times
Reputation: 1001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Chaser View Post
I feel you are selling the whole city of Chicago short. The transit is taken seriously on the South Side as well.
Right but as a percentage it trails the north side by a good amount.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top