Largest Combined Statistical Areas by Nov 2010-Nov 2012 Non-Farm Job Growth (live, state)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Combined Statistical Areas and their component Metro Areas and the numerical change in total non-farm jobs between Nov 2010-Nov 2012 as well as data for the nation's largest uncombined Metropolitan Statistical Areas.
New York-Newark-Bridgeport +173,100
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island +155,700
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown +4,700
New Haven-Milford +3,800
Trenton-Ewing +3,800
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk +3,400
Kingston +1,700
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside +148,800
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana +128,400
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario +17,700
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura +2,700
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland +145,400
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont +76,200
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara +54,800
Santa Rosa-Petaluma +5,700
Santa Cruz-Watsonville +5,400
Vallejo-Fairfield +2,400
Napa +900
Also I am little surprised there is not more growth for DC,
with Baltimore removed its at 66K - given the growth rate of the area that might suggest that there was slowing of the job adds in DC. Also Baltimore nearly matched DC with many fewer people. Just expected more in the relative sense from DC. Maybe the slow down of the govt expansion was the impact
Also I am little surprised there is not more growth for DC,
with Baltimore removed its at 66K - given the growth rate of the area that might suggest that there was slowing of the job adds in DC. Also Baltimore nearly matched DC with many fewer people. Just expected more in the relative sense from DC. Maybe the slow down of the govt expansion was the impact
Government jobs aren't being created like they were. My company owns a ton of office real estate in DC, and when we talk about market conditions in our board meetings there are very strong concerns about DC in the coming few years.
[quote=Chicago60614;27684273]Government jobs aren't being created like they were. My company owns a ton of office real estate in DC, and when we talk about market conditions in our board meetings there are very strong concerns about DC in the coming few years.[/QUOTE]
Of course there is... didn't we all see it coming?
Legitimately surprised to see Detroit up there. Ann Arbor has always been a good city for growth, but even Flint is showing modest numbers? Is this still Michigan?
Legitimately surprised to see Detroit up there. Ann Arbor has always been a good city for growth, but even Flint is showing modest numbers? Is this still Michigan?
Every major city in Michigan other than Detroit is now below the national average in unemployment. Ann Arbor is at 4.3%, Grand Rapids 5.4%, Lansing 5.6%, Kalamazoo 6%, even Flint is down to 7.8%. Detroit metro is the only one still hanging up there at 9.7%, but that is a big improvement over where it was. Things are looking up here for sure.
Every major city in Michigan other than Detroit is now below the national average in unemployment. Ann Arbor is at 4.3%, Grand Rapids 5.4%, Lansing 5.6%, Kalamazoo 6%, even Flint is down to 7.8%. Detroit metro is the only one still hanging up there at 9.7%, but that is a big improvement over where it was. Things are looking up here for sure.
Baltimore's numbers are a pleasant surprise. Could we be turning that corner?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.