Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which metro area do you prefer
DFW 109 36.33%
Bay Area- 191 63.67%
Voters: 300. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-30-2020, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Wine Country, California
653 posts, read 464,512 times
Reputation: 832

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123 View Post
Neither is really true. Dallas is a great bang for the buck, but money no object, Bay Area rules. To me it boils down to earning potential. Either can suck your soul if you approach it that way. Bay Area actually has a better likelihood of doing so, with long hours and such. My Pa was just short of a top earner in the Bay Area, and it gave him two strokes and a 1600sf house plus big taxes. He was at least smart enough to not try to ladder up houses.

DFW has quite a bit of culture, and good cuisine. You gotta drive a bit further for the cuisine, the diversity isn’t as embedded as it is in the Bay Area. Summers are difficult. But the cost of living is stupid cheap in comparison.

Neither is perfect.
Nobody's arguing "perfect."

I'm merely stating my position. I am a top earner in SF and moved here specifically for the career advancement SF offered, compared to Texas. (non-tech, btw) I moved from Houston, but lived in Dallas for awhile doing my same work.

The Dallas market for my profession was a bit better than Houston's, but still quite bad in comparison to places like NYC, LA, Chicago or SF.

My personal observation is that Dallas and SF are nearly POLAR OPPOSITES in every way--lifestyle, urban makeup, weather, culture, etc. If you're someone who likes and identifies with an urban, San Francisco (in the City, rather than the greater Bay Area) lifestyle you will most likely think Dallas' more suburban lifestyle sucks. And vice-versa, perhaps.

In all honesty with regard to Dallas, though, I even preferred Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2020, 03:03 PM
 
Location: Born + raised SF Bay; Tyler, TX now WNY
8,505 posts, read 4,747,409 times
Reputation: 8429
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanoSF View Post
Nobody's arguing "perfect."

I'm merely stating my position. I am a top earner in SF and moved here specifically for the career advancement SF offered, compared to Texas. (non-tech, btw) I moved from Houston, but lived in Dallas for awhile doing my same work.

The Dallas market for my profession was a bit better than Houston's, but still quite bad in comparison to places like NYC, LA, Chicago or SF.

My personal observation is that Dallas and SF are nearly POLAR OPPOSITES in every way--lifestyle, urban makeup, weather, culture, etc. If you're someone who likes and identifies with an urban, San Francisco (in the City, rather than the greater Bay Area) lifestyle you will most likely think Dallas' more suburban lifestyle sucks. And vice-versa, perhaps.

In all honesty with regard to Dallas, though, I even preferred Houston.
Of course, I can’t comment on your career situation...

I take your point, between the two only the Bay Area has a true urban choice. If you’re more of a suburb dude like me, suddenly they don’t actually look all that terribly different. I happen to like both, it’s the COL that breaks it open for me and DFW. Money no object...I’d be back home in the Bay Area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2020, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,750 posts, read 6,736,185 times
Reputation: 7599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
data centers are increasingly moving to Virginia or the Columbia river valley where it's easier to build and power's cheaper.
Data centers have always been located in Northern VA, DFW, Phoenix, and the Pac NW. That's not new.

Bay Area will continue to be the HQ for most mid-large tech companies, but I could see more locating a higher share of people outside the region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2020, 06:24 PM
 
Location: Greater Orlampa CSA
5,025 posts, read 5,679,653 times
Reputation: 3950
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
This is meaningless tho.

The SF Metro Area's economy is booming regardless and actually surpassed the DFW GDP in the last couple of years and the SF MSA has a faster growing GDP than the DFW MSA even though DFW has 3 million more people.

So Im happy for all the DFW growth but let's not get confused into thinking the Bay Area is suffering by comparison-it actually looks like the Bay Area is much better positioned economically.
The Bay Area is an absolute beast because of a single cog (tech). Based on that one cog it’s one of the most dynamic economies on earth and will be for foreseeable future, as long as it continues that hold on tech.

I guess I’m thinking about things broadly/holistically though (municipal budget health, average livability/COL for middle and lower class residents, homelessness, infrastructure, etc.). Not saying SF is or isn’t ahead in those areas-but what I’m saying is in spite of SF being an absolute beast on some levels-I feel like it’s worth at least discussing other aspects of the picture. For instance (and, not trying to pick on it at all, just holding trying to have high level discourse), but if Stockton for example is considered part of the Greater Bay Area.. it’s worth discussing some of the comparative problems there-I’m not sure Greater DFW has things like a Stockton, or the level of problem homelessness can be there (NYT wrote an illuminating article about this fact)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2020, 08:26 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,156 posts, read 39,430,503 times
Reputation: 21253
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavsfan137 View Post
The Bay Area is an absolute beast because of a single cog (tech). Based on that one cog it’s one of the most dynamic economies on earth and will be for foreseeable future, as long as it continues that hold on tech.

I guess I’m thinking about things broadly/holistically though (municipal budget health, average livability/COL for middle and lower class residents, homelessness, infrastructure, etc.). Not saying SF is or isn’t ahead in those areas-but what I’m saying is in spite of SF being an absolute beast on some levels-I feel like it’s worth at least discussing other aspects of the picture. For instance (and, not trying to pick on it at all, just holding trying to have high level discourse), but if Stockton for example is considered part of the Greater Bay Area.. it’s worth discussing some of the comparative problems there-I’m not sure Greater DFW has things like a Stockton, or the level of problem homelessness can be there (NYT wrote an illuminating article about this fact)
The thing with tech is that it’s an odd sector that essentially breaks into other sectors. You’ve probably noticed that the tech sector has found its way into many other sectors and has done so to a massive extent. It’s also a funding model of sorts that acts pretty quickly.

Anyhow, the Bay Area also has a lot of other non-tech specific industries like finance, apparel, pharmaceuticals, and energy—take a look at the largest corporations in the Bay Area at some point and you’ll find that there are several very large corporations in industries that are not tech specific. Also, it hosts a pretty major port and the area brings in quite a bit of tourism. This is also one of the areas that the two are very comparable—both the Bay Area and the Metroplex are host to headquarters of many of the largest corporations in the US and it’s not solely dominated by any specific industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top