Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-09-2015, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Auburn, New York
1,772 posts, read 3,516,620 times
Reputation: 3076

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Buster View Post
I'm not sure you were actually in the south side of Pittsburgh -- it is mostly independent stuff, not chains. South side is centered on E. Carson St from about 10th St. to about 26th st. The only national chain stuff I can think of there would be coffee shops or fast food.

You may have been at Station Square, which is directly across the Monogahela from downtown. It is chain / tourist bars and restaurants, like Inner Harbor. Someone may have told you it was on the south side, which technically it is, but that's not the area that's called the South Side. Another possibility is you were at South Side Works, which is a retail development on the eastern edge of the South Side neighborhood (but not at all like the actual neighborhood).

I do like some of Baltimore's neighborhoods, they can be fun.
No, it wasn't Station Square. After poking around Google Maps, I guess I was around Water and 27th: https://goo.gl/maps/HpfTcmYiZaw. It felt very suburban: there was like a Cheesecake Factory, an H&M, and a PF Changs.

However, judging from Google Maps, the area between Station Square and Water and 27th, looks pretty neat.

I'll be back in Pitt sooner or later, and I'm looking forward to exploring the city in more detail. I sense that there's a lot going on if you scratch below the surface.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-09-2015, 11:50 AM
 
3,291 posts, read 2,768,878 times
Reputation: 3375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawn.Davenport View Post
No, it wasn't Station Square. After poking around Google Maps, I guess I was around Water and 27th: https://goo.gl/maps/HpfTcmYiZaw. It felt very suburban: there was like a Cheesecake Factory, an H&M, and a PF Changs.

However, judging from Google Maps, the area between Station Square and Water and 27th, looks pretty neat.

Oh, that's South Side Works, yeah that's a retail development, not the neighborhood itself. but you were nearby. If you go west from there on E Carson St from 26th to 10th St, that's the business district of the South Side neighborhood. It's much, much different from where you were. a very large neighborhood with a wide variety of things.

Last edited by _Buster; 12-09-2015 at 12:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Seattle aka tier 3 city :)
1,259 posts, read 1,404,481 times
Reputation: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
While I can see Vancouver, I did not get that feeling. Yes, there are a lot of all glass high rise apartment complexes, but at street-level, it's not like that.

https://goo.gl/maps/X1FcbjWRf6o

https://goo.gl/maps/ppXyzv9uAYJ2

https://goo.gl/maps/sUUa5foeAsN2

https://goo.gl/maps/4sWgD9FirB82

https://goo.gl/maps/5Bx9S7os7vM2
I agree, Vancouver is far from sterile, don't judge the city from an aerial photo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 12:00 PM
 
4,516 posts, read 5,090,184 times
Reputation: 4834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Actually I think a lot of midsized cities have pretty vibrant downtowns that are only getting better.
Yep. I think Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Milwaukee are among those you're talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Auburn, New York
1,772 posts, read 3,516,620 times
Reputation: 3076
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheProf View Post
Yep. I think Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Milwaukee are among those you're talking about.
I'dd add Troy, New York to that list. It's seriously the best-kept secret in the country.

Syracuse's downtown has also improved by three-fold in the past five years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 02:06 PM
 
632 posts, read 932,305 times
Reputation: 739
For big cities, I'd say Houston is #1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 02:06 PM
 
150 posts, read 223,196 times
Reputation: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheel84 View Post
I agree that Seattle and portlands downtown proper are oddly sterile. There inner neighborhoods are where those cities shine.
That's only if you have a very narrow view of Downtown. For example, Pioneer Square and the Pike Place Market area in Seattle and Old Town and the Pearl District in Portland are not sterile and those areas are frequently considered part of Downtown. If you limit "Downtown" to only the areas with the tallest buildings that are active from 9-5 on weekdays, then yes they're sterile. But that can even be said for cities with Amazing Downtowns like Chicago and San Francisco. Have you been to the Financial District in SF or (at least portions of) The Loop in Chicago? Those areas feel pretty sterile too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,736,928 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by atler8 View Post
That's all fine & good but more importantly, will there actually be a complete, full square mile in D.C. that will have a resident population of 80,000?


I could definitely see Union Market/NOMA/Northwest One/Mount Vernon Triangle/Union Station/H Street getting there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 02:31 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,627,760 times
Reputation: 13630
A bunch of new, shiny developments doesn't really help the case for a downtown becoming less sterile imo. Sounds like DC will continue on its current track for sterile developments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,736,928 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
A bunch of new, shiny developments doesn't really help the case for a downtown becoming less sterile imo. Sounds like DC will continue on its current track for sterile developments.
Isn't every single city in the nation building new shiny buildings? Seems like the real problem is that you don't like modern architecture. I love it. Old buildings don't have rooftop pools and live oxygen plant wall fitness centers. You can have the old busted buildings. I need floor to ceiling windows. I have yet to see a building go up anywhere in 2015 that doesn't look the exact same. They aren't building anything like they did 100 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top