Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Philadelphia vs. Seattle
Philadelphia 79 50.00%
Seattle 79 50.00%
Voters: 158. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2023, 01:23 PM
 
365 posts, read 229,599 times
Reputation: 529

Advertisements

This video of Capitol Hill in Seattle captures the vibe well, albeit it's a bit dark:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrR30tZ2si0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2023, 08:17 PM
 
Location: 215
2,235 posts, read 1,116,789 times
Reputation: 1985
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
A few things:

All significant cities are required to implement zoning to allow sixplexes (bigger cities) or fourplexes in most SFR areas by next year thanks to 2023 legislation.

The HOA thing sounds vaguely familiar but I don't believe anything earth-shattering passed.

In 2019 or so, Seattle changed SFR zoning to allow accessory units, generally two (i.e. three units total) if the site is big enough. One can be detached and both have to be small.

Tacoma upstaged everyone a couple years ago by implementing four-plexes and accessory units. I'm forgetting the details.

All metro cities are redoing their comprehensive plans in 2024 per State requirement, and each plan will accommodate the State's housing need projections. King County (half the metro) has to accommodate 309,000 more units over 20 years, including 112,000 in Seattle, 35,000 in Bellevue, and 20,000 in Redmond. Some cities are considering allowing more than required, including Bellevue whose EIS has a 70,000 alternative.

We failed to pass State legislation mandating higher-density zoning near frequent transit (bus or train). Maybe next year.
That's for the better, because occasionally I'll come across things like this:

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6242...8192?entry=ttu

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6227...8192?entry=ttu
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2023, 09:25 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,848,510 times
Reputation: 8651
Those are emblematic of the 20% of Seattle that already allowed real density before the stuff I talked about. The fringes of those areas have lower height limits and often get townhouses like these.

They manage to be reasonably dense because each tends to have a second row behind the first, totaling three or four units where one house used to stand. They typically have exactly one parking space per unit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top