Southern city with most fast-paced CBDS going into 2020? (compared, Atlanta, people)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hmm... Not saying this because I live here, but Orlando should be in this discussion, as its CBD is literally doubling in size with the addition of the UCF Downtown campus and the Creative Village...
My votes would be Austin and Orlando. For poll purposes, given the selection, Austin.
Most fast paced: close but I gave Nashville the edge, due to the constant surge and flow of tourists on Lower Broadway--which is comparable to shoulder to shoulder sea of crowds you see in Times Square. Combine that with the incredible amount of construction projects, government workers in the capital area, and the workers/residents in the core of downtown, and Nashville edges other cities.
Others that even exceed the hustle & bustle of Nashville, but lack that major tourist surge are Atlanta, Dallas, Houston & Austin.
Wish I could edit my post... Are we talking most fast-paced GROWTH or just most fast-paced in general (as in rat-race, NYC style?)
If the latter, I'd say Dallas. I love Atlanta, but its CDB is anything BUT fast-paced.
Wish I could edit my post... Are we talking most fast-paced GROWTH or just most fast-paced in general (as in rat-race, NYC style?)
If the latter, I'd say Dallas. I love Atlanta, but its CDB is anything BUT fast-paced.
Hmmm... interesting. I'm curious as to why you would say Dallas? I can see why you'd say outside the CBD, but inside?
Hmmm... interesting. I'm curious as to why you would say Dallas? I can see why you'd say outside the CBD, but inside?
It's really the only one to me that stands out as being "fast-paced," where people are running about on narrow streets in tightly-packed city blocks with a decent level of street-level density.
I was there for work one week and really felt like I was in a well-grounded urban environment.
With this criteria, I don't see it as "most improved," as compared to the others, since 2010. New Orleans development has not been robust.
It has a good flow of folks in the french quarter, but that is not the immediate downtown area. If you include the french quarter, then the bustle and energy increases.
I am surprised Memphis and Louisville aren't on the list.
This is kind of a hard thread to give an answer to. Unless one has equal experience in all southern cities, it would be hard to come up with a balanced opinion. Tourism produces a different vibe compared to a downtown with a large workforce, rapid transit and useful amenities.
This year I've been to Nashville, Memphis, Atlanta and Dallas. To stay with the flow of the thread, I will leave Memphis out of my post.
Nashville is building like crazy. I think I've seen more growth and buildings going up than the other 2 cities I've visited. Most of the foot traffic is casual tourist traffic that doesn't hussle like it does in a big city.
Atlanta gets picked on a lot because of low density but I did feel the big city thing in Atlanta. I guess its because I took marta in from the airport to Five Points. It felt organic and yes the city felt alive but not like Chicago.
Dallas seemed a little bit more like a big city. I did not take dart into downtown but it seemed just a little busier.
I wish I could comment on the others especially Miami and Charlotte. Cities are changing so fast now. Things could definitely pop out ahead for Atlanta within a year or two but as of right now, I will give a slight advantage to Dallas.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.