Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2020, 07:44 AM
 
12,101 posts, read 17,087,371 times
Reputation: 15771

Advertisements

I was lucky enough to spend the 90s in the Bay Area at times in San Francisco and most of the 00s in NYC.

I think those were great periods for each of those cities. Culturally, and counter-culturally, both cities were unparalleled at that time I believe, whereas nowadays, there are many liberal hipsterish (for lack of a better word) areas spread all over, even places in like Iowa. Los Angeles in the 90s had the diversity to match, but still had the personality of a shallow beach city, and wouldn't develop to become I would argue more culturally hip than SF until many years later.

Back in the 90s both places were still semi-affordable, and even into the 00s, the not most desirable areas, but not undesirable (read: Queens ) were even still affordable. Nowadays it's almost limited to the wealthy. Counter-culture has become mainstream and record shops have all been replaced with Chipotle.

To me, I think the 90s/early 00s are the best decade for both cities for a number of reasons.

Compare your view of 90s SF/Bay Area versus 90s NYC. Which city was best?

You can use the 80s and 00s too if you like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2020, 01:44 PM
 
16,690 posts, read 29,506,412 times
Reputation: 7665
Quote:
Originally Posted by jobaba View Post
I was lucky enough to spend the 90s in the Bay Area at times in San Francisco and most of the 00s in NYC.

I think those were great periods for each of those cities. Culturally, and counter-culturally, both cities were unparalleled at that time I believe, whereas nowadays, there are many liberal hipsterish (for lack of a better word) areas spread all over, even places in like Iowa. Los Angeles in the 90s had the diversity to match, but still had the personality of a shallow beach city, and wouldn't develop to become I would argue more culturally hip than SF until many years later.

Back in the 90s both places were still semi-affordable, and even into the 00s, the not most desirable areas, but not undesirable (read: Queens ) were even still affordable. Nowadays it's almost limited to the wealthy. Counter-culture has become mainstream and record shops have all been replaced with Chipotle.

To me, I think the 90s/early 00s are the best decade for both cities for a number of reasons.

Compare your view of 90s SF/Bay Area versus 90s NYC. Which city was best?

You can use the 80s and 00s too if you like.
90s NYC was great. 90s SF as well.


I think it was because of the 90s. This is when GenXers were full-on in their 20s...or going from their late teens to early twenties.

It is often said that GenXers are the last American or adult generation, and the 90s was the last American or adult decade

"Last American (or Adult)" is not meant in some weird overly-patriotic, nationalistic, xenophobic phrase in this context. More on what it means here: https://www.google.com/search?q=The+...hrome&ie=UTF-8
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 02:47 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 3,595,519 times
Reputation: 5055
NYC probably had more flavor at that point.

I'll try to find some videos later
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 03:15 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 3,595,519 times
Reputation: 5055
Gen X really are the last ones who came of age in era that was truly much different from now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 03:18 PM
 
16,690 posts, read 29,506,412 times
Reputation: 7665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foamposite View Post
Gen X really are the last ones who came of age in era that was truly much different from now.
Yessir. See my links above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 05:19 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries4118 View Post
90s NYC was great. 90s SF as well.


I think it was because of the 90s. This is when GenXers were full-on in their 20s...or going from their late teens to early twenties.

It is often said that GenXers are the last American or adult generation, and the 90s was the last American or adult decade

"Last American (or Adult)" is not meant in some weird overly-patriotic, nationalistic, xenophobic phrase in this context. More on what it means here: https://www.google.com/search?q=The+...hrome&ie=UTF-8
Sort of hearkens back to the last generation before widespread television and then even earlier before widespread radio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 06:47 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,709,693 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries4118 View Post
Yessir. See my links above.
What about Millenials born between 1980 and 1984? They mostly came of age during that “different time”, pre-internet, thriving monoculture, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 07:39 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 3,595,519 times
Reputation: 5055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_Adultman View Post
What about Millenials born between 1980 and 1984? They mostly came of age during that “different time”, pre-internet, thriving monoculture, as well.
Not really, someone born in 1984 wouldn't be 18 until 2002. They saw the 90s as kids, but were in the information age by the time they were young adults.

80 to 81 you can make the case for, but it's still borderline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,673 posts, read 14,635,860 times
Reputation: 15383
Those cities and the areas around them still had their original identities and what made them great in the ‘80s and ‘90s. Then crime rates (and crack/heroin usage) went down, young people with money decided they wanted to live in cities not suburbs, and working/middle class neighborhoods gentrified like wildfire into the same bland mishmash of coffee shops and restaurants that make the kind of food that pays exorbitant rents. Artists, musicians, working class families and the rest get pushed out, starve or sleep several people to a room.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 08:06 PM
 
2,223 posts, read 1,394,054 times
Reputation: 2911
1980 dob is more of a gen xer than millennial I think. They probably didn't have a cell phone until late college, and by the time the iPhone was mainstream they were almost 30.

As transformative as the internet itself was, I think the modern smartphone is what really made it a different world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top