Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the idea here is second cities of a metropolitan area. But the problem is that Fort Worth is something like 30 miles from Dallas, while Oakland is only about 7 miles from San Francisco. San Francisco and Oakland function together in a way that I don't believe Dallas and Fort Worth do.
Actually Oakland and Saint Paul is a decent matchup, both as second cities near the first one, as working class cities next to a more middle class city, as industrial cities
Seattle and Portland, OR. Both similar climates, very liberal, surrounded by mountains, natural beauty, green, hipsters, similar landscape, etc. In the "wet part" of their respective states.
I think the idea here is second cities of a metropolitan area. But the problem is that Fort Worth is something like 30 miles from Dallas, while Oakland is only about 7 miles from San Francisco. San Francisco and Oakland function together in a way that I don't believe Dallas and Fort Worth do.
Actually Oakland and Saint Paul is a decent matchup, both as second cities near the first one, as working class cities next to a more middle class city, as industrial cities
So the defining characteristic of all these cities is their proximity to other places?? Nope.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.