Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, or Pheonix??
Houston 25 10.68%
Dallas 25 10.68%
Atlanta 35 14.96%
Pheonix 86 36.75%
All of the above 63 26.92%
Voters: 234. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2010, 09:46 AM
 
198 posts, read 654,042 times
Reputation: 156

Advertisements

I remember visiting Phoenix in 2002, Remember 3 decently tall skyscrapers in Downtown and 3-4 highrises in uptown, now Downtown is looking good, 3 skyscrapers have went up since last year, uptown has about 15 buildings now.

Dont know how Phoenix compares to these other cities, but I do know cranes have not left the skyline for a decade now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2010, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,747,031 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milwaukee City View Post
According to population estimates released today for all metro areas by the U.S. Census Bureau, the Atlanta metro area gained 890,000 residents from April 1, 2000, to July 1, 2006, the largest numerical gain of the nation’s 361 metro areas. This Georgia metro area (Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta) was the nation’s ninth largest as of July 1, 2006 with a population of 5.1 million. Overall, six metro areas each gained at least 500,000 people between 2000 and 2006.



US Census Press Releases (http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/009865.html - broken link)
Between 2000 and 2008 the most population gains were:

Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex: 1,138,462
Metro Atlanta: 1,128,304
Metro Phoenix: 1,030,023
Metro Houston: 1,012,736

Back to the question, are any of them growing too fast? Besides the typical growing pains, I dont know that a place can grow too fast. I know here in Dallas the city is preparing for it with the DART rail expansion (including the proposed line from Plano/Richardson to DFW Airport). Fort Worth is also adding a line from Southwest Fort Worth to DFW.

I know Phoenix and Houston are doing similar things too.

Atlanta needs to improve its freeway system. Its running into the same problem that Austin is. Too many people and too few roads for what it has. Im sure they will figure that out and be fine.

http://www.marketingcharts.com/topic...n-the-us-8458/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 11:00 AM
 
Location: USA
5,738 posts, read 5,443,536 times
Reputation: 3669
Phoenix is growing too fast. Building a city in the middle of a desert with no water is absolutely ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Surprise, AZ
8,631 posts, read 10,148,927 times
Reputation: 7992
Quote:
Originally Posted by It'sAutomatic View Post
Phoenix is growing too fast. Building a city in the middle of a desert with no water is absolutely ridiculous.
First off, the city wasn't just built yesterday, it just grew alot over the past 10 years. Can you care to describe to us the source of Phoenix water or at least do some research before posting?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,245,825 times
Reputation: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyrsc View Post
I remember visiting Phoenix in 2002, Remember 3 decently tall skyscrapers in Downtown and 3-4 highrises in uptown, now Downtown is looking good, 3 skyscrapers have went up since last year, uptown has about 15 buildings now.

Dont know how Phoenix compares to these other cities, but I do know cranes have not left the skyline for a decade now.
Likewise, the cranes have not left the skyline for more than a decade here in Houston. Luckily financing was secured before the reccession for 3 buildings ranging from 300 ft to 600 ft(that are still under construction currently), and with MainPlace scheduled to be completed in 2011, along with the new Embassy Suites, I doubt any new notable towers will be constructed until the economy picks up. Even throught the city, proposals for new buildings have been nothing too big, just some mid-rise for Uptown as a notable exception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 04:29 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,841,718 times
Reputation: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by taydev View Post
I dont think houston will have a problem with a growing population. Its already a large city (bigger than the others named on the poll) and has an ok trans system so far. I also agree with flyimetro, people need to compete, and almost every city wants more people
Houston city limits is 602 square miles. You could fit Chicago, Philiadelphia, and Boston, inside of Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 04:36 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,955,543 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Houston city limits is 602 square miles. You could fit Chicago, Philiadelphia, and Boston, inside of Houston.
What exactly does this have to do with anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,747,031 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Houston city limits is 602 square miles. You could fit Chicago, Philiadelphia, and Boston, inside of Houston.
Im not so sure it really matters. Houston is simply designed different. Metro Houston has its urban and most of its suburban neighborhoods in Houston proper. Vs. a DFW where most of its suburban neighborhoods are their own cities.

I dont know that one is right or wrong. I dont think they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 04:41 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,841,718 times
Reputation: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface713 View Post
What exactly does this have to do with anything?
You tell me..You the one that seems to have the problem with it. I stated a fact about the impressive size of the city of Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2010, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,764,232 times
Reputation: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Houston city limits is 602 square miles. You could fit Chicago, Philiadelphia, and Boston, inside of Houston.
Houston is.......HUGE! Dallas city limit is 385 square miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top