Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-15-2011, 07:30 AM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,759,177 times
Reputation: 1681

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by clamentae View Post
I think the best is Chicago,even over New York,its more beautiful in my opinion. The worst would have to be Milwaukee, it has 3 tall one, then nothing to back it up, or Cincinatti.
Cincinnati?


http://www.urbanohio.com/forum2/inde...opic=3170.3960

 
Old 06-15-2011, 02:10 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
1,472 posts, read 3,545,349 times
Reputation: 1583
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffredo View Post
You guys have shown me nothing in the five months since I first posted in this thread. Fresno has the worst skyline for a city of 500,000. Nothing can touch its high rise mediocrity.

Wanna see how it looked 40 years ago? No problem - its more or less the same as today!
Edit: Image is not copyrighted


PictureNinja.com - Picture of Downtown Fresno
 
Old 06-17-2011, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Ark-La-Tex
113 posts, read 296,829 times
Reputation: 96
Phoenix
 
Old 06-17-2011, 02:26 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,857,597 times
Reputation: 2698
"Worst" and "small" are two different things people.
 
Old 06-21-2011, 10:04 PM
 
4 posts, read 19,529 times
Reputation: 10
Albuquerque is horrible I live here and the skyline is just short (the tallest building is 351 ft tall and the next is 256 ft) and boring to look at. I wish anti development people wouldn't cry every time a big project is proposed they really hold things like skyscrapers and arenas back. Packard place (500+ ft will never happen, Chant tower 27 stories will never happen). I can't what till I move back to Dallas.
 
Old 06-21-2011, 10:15 PM
 
4 posts, read 19,529 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post
"Worst" and "small" are two different things people.
I totally get what your saying but short buildings and a small skyline are huge parts of it along with the buidings not being that dense and albuquerque has all three of those along with ugly buildings. I love how dense chicago's skyline looks at night almost like a huge glossy curtain. Dallas too but of course not as long as Chicago.
 
Old 06-21-2011, 10:29 PM
 
4 posts, read 19,529 times
Reputation: 10
Never mind after seeing that photo of fresno. Fresno is the worst. But ABQ has a population of 545,852 bigger than miami, *tlanta and New Orleans in population and in size. Now I noiw they have more money but still. ABQ has had its chances.
 
Old 06-22-2011, 10:14 AM
 
Location: An Island off the coast of North America
449 posts, read 1,132,058 times
Reputation: 119
No, no, no, the city with the worst skyline is the CITY of Glen Cove,NY. Why? Its all suburban buildings and houses! You can barely see it! LOL!

I'm gonna go with Fresno, too.
 
Old 06-22-2011, 07:07 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,891,217 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatDallastxKid View Post
Albuquerque is horrible I live here and the skyline is just short (the tallest building is 351 ft tall and the next is 256 ft) and boring to look at. I wish anti development people wouldn't cry every time a big project is proposed they really hold things like skyscrapers and arenas back. Packard place (500+ ft will never happen, Chant tower 27 stories will never happen). I can't what till I move back to Dallas.
Quote:
I totally get what your saying but short buildings and a small skyline are huge parts of it along with the buidings not being that dense and albuquerque has all three of those along with ugly buildings. I love how dense chicago's skyline looks at night almost like a huge glossy curtain. Dallas too but of course not as long as Chicago.
Quote:
Never mind after seeing that photo of fresno. Fresno is the worst. But ABQ has a population of 545,852 bigger than miami, *tlanta and New Orleans in population and in size. Now I noiw they have more money but still. ABQ has had its chances.

...what?

Um, first off, welcome to the forum, and second, the size of a city doesn't mean much as far as the skyline goes. If you're from Dallas (IF you're really from Dallas), all you have to do is look to your neighbor to the west and know that for a fact.

Albuquerque's skyline may not be the greatest, but at least they have a couple triangle top buildings. I'd KILL for one of those in Ft. Worth.
 
Old 10-05-2011, 04:20 PM
 
125 posts, read 286,599 times
Reputation: 108
Worst skylines in my opinion. Not in order except for Phoenix and San Antonio

1) Phoenix, AZ
2) San Antonio, TX
3) Salt Lake City, UT
4) Jacksonville, FL - it just doesn't look right
5) Tallahassee, FL
6) Milwaukee, WI
7) Detroit, MI
8) Youngstown, OH - although I've read it's the same skyline for the past 70 years
9) Abilene, TX
10) Madison, WI
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top