Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2009, 03:25 PM
 
93,231 posts, read 123,842,121 times
Reputation: 18258

Advertisements

Wow...Syracuse comes in at #24. While the rankings aren't bad lately, the area has so much more potential it's not even funny.

Also, keep in mind that this is for college graduates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2009, 04:44 PM
 
4,574 posts, read 7,498,900 times
Reputation: 2613
So I guess Houston is doing fairly well in the recession.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Manhattan
1,160 posts, read 2,959,200 times
Reputation: 1388
Highest Medium Pay; Pay Growth (05/06 to 09); Unemployment
1 San Jose, CA $90,700; 4.59%; 11.90%
2 San Francisco, CA $74,800; 6.65%; 10.60%
3 Bridgeport, CT $70,100; 12.17%; 8.00%
4 Washington, DC $69,000; 8.18%; 6.20%
5 Oxnard, CA $66,400; 7.57%; 11.10%
6 New York, NY $66,400; 7.84%; 9.10%
7 Houston, TX $66,000; 14.07%; 8.50%
8 Seattle, WA $65,600; 5.71%; 9.00%
9 Los Angeles, CA $65,300; 8.57%; 11.90%
10 Boston, MA $65,200; 2.92%; 7.90%

Seems like Bridgeport and Houston are the places to be for already high incomes with high levels of income growth and decent unemployment rates that aren't sky high like California's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayp1188 View Post
Highest Medium Pay; Pay Growth (05/06 to 09); Unemployment
1 San Jose, CA $90,700; 4.59%; 11.90%
2 San Francisco, CA $74,800; 6.65%; 10.60%
3 Bridgeport, CT $70,100; 12.17%; 8.00%
4 Washington, DC $69,000; 8.18%; 6.20%
5 Oxnard, CA $66,400; 7.57%; 11.10%
6 New York, NY $66,400; 7.84%; 9.10%
7 Houston, TX $66,000; 14.07%; 8.50%
8 Seattle, WA $65,600; 5.71%; 9.00%
9 Los Angeles, CA $65,300; 8.57%; 11.90%
10 Boston, MA $65,200; 2.92%; 7.90%

Seems like Bridgeport and Houston are the places to be for already high incomes with high levels of income growth and decent unemployment rates that aren't sky high like California's.
Arent sky high? Are you kidding? 8% unemployment is in fact sky high and not decent in the least-actually its horrible.

Furthermore,
Houston has lost 95,000 jobs or 3.6% loss in ONE YEAR.
Job losses pile up across Houston area: 95,100 positions gone in the past year; experts divided about rebound hopes | North America > United States from AllBusiness.com (http://www.allbusiness.com/labor-employment/human-resources-personnel-management/12992489-1.html - broken link)

Let's not kid ourselves. We all suck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 09:46 PM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,324,530 times
Reputation: 6231
#8, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ represent lol. I love this area, its so beautiful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2009, 12:46 AM
 
1,712 posts, read 3,101,920 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
According to the OPs link...

Highest Median Pay, 2009
1 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA $90,700
2 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA $74,800
3 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT $70,100
4 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV $69,000
5 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA $66,400
6 New York-Northern NJ-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA $66,400
7 Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX $66,000
8 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA $65,600
9 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA $65,300
10 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH $65,200

Go Houston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
1,160 posts, read 2,959,200 times
Reputation: 1388
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Arent sky high? Are you kidding? 8% unemployment is in fact sky high and not decent in the least-actually its horrible.

Furthermore,
Houston has lost 95,000 jobs or 3.6% loss in ONE YEAR.
Job losses pile up across Houston area: 95,100 positions gone in the past year; experts divided about rebound hopes | North America > United States from AllBusiness.com (http://www.allbusiness.com/labor-employment/human-resources-personnel-management/12992489-1.html - broken link)

Let's not kid ourselves. We all suck.
They are not sky high relative to the current economy, which is what I meant. Bridgeport and Houston's unemployment rates are below the national average, whereas the 4 CA cities on the top 10 highest median pay list (San Jose, San Francisco, LA, and Oxnard) are all above the national average (10.0% as of Nov 2009 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top