Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
These two areas are kind of niche areas for different parts of the world in terms of immigration patterns ("Bay Area" for Asians and South Florida for Caribbean/Latin Americans)
I was wondering what you guys think is the more diverse/international/cosmopolitan region
"SF Bay Area" (San Francisco's CSA) or South Florida (Miami MSA)
Via
Foreign Tourism
International Business
Number of Immigrants
Number of Languages Spoken
Number of foreign language speakers
Consulates
Diversity
International Connections
Anything else?
Unlike the Bay Area, South Florida has ethnicities and nationalities in SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS from every single Central, South, and Carribbean country, in addition to a very cosmopolitan European population.
I feel like the Bay Area is dominated by a few Asian groups (Chinese, Filipinos, Indians, and Vietnamese) and Mexicans.
So that is 5 countries vs. the more than 20 countries that make up this hemisphere.
Do Carribbean Blacks and non-Mexican Latinos count less in the cosmopolitan sphere?
I think its so fla based upon my understanding of international/cosmopolitan. I translate that to mean unaffordable place to live with no hope of getting a job in the area either. SF Bay area has high tech with jobs so it isnt a fit but so. fla is a match with tourism as its main industry, jobs are scare and dont pay enough to live there.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.