Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, N.C.
36,499 posts, read 54,129,991 times
Reputation: 47919

Advertisements

IRS collects tax refund because her father owed taxes when she was 5 years old. WTF? I would be loaded for bear.

Can the government seize your tax refund to pay a relative's debt? - CBS News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2014, 08:00 PM
 
Location: Carmichael, CA
2,410 posts, read 4,460,990 times
Reputation: 4380
There's always been a statute of limitations on how far they can go back to collect.

However, when the Farm Bill was passed--this last one? the one before?--there was a section in it totally removing the statute of limitations.

IRS said they didn't ask for it, but are following the law. Congress says they don't know who put it in there, and apparently nobody read the whole bill. The president signed it.

I don't agree with the change in law, but the fact that the country is passing laws that they don't even know about is scary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 08:26 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,909,608 times
Reputation: 18305
I have to wander when both parents died and if they had notified and if she was benefitted by estate that then owed the money? I have a feeling there maybe more than we read there all told.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2014, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, N.C.
36,499 posts, read 54,129,991 times
Reputation: 47919
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb73 View Post
There's always been a statute of limitations on how far they can go back to collect.

However, when the Farm Bill was passed--this last one? the one before?--there was a section in it totally removing the statute of limitations.

IRS said they didn't ask for it, but are following the law. Congress says they don't know who put it in there, and apparently nobody read the whole bill. The president signed it.

I don't agree with the change in law, but the fact that the country is passing laws that they don't even know about is scary.
Indeed. They are too busy sniping back and forth to even read what they are voting on. I worked on The Hill years ago and it was enough to make me want to let everybody know what was REALLY going on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2014, 06:59 AM
 
12,063 posts, read 10,287,471 times
Reputation: 24801
They did away with it yesterday. Called it a mistake.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/15/us...ts.html?ref=us
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2014, 07:07 AM
 
Location: NY
9,130 posts, read 20,028,982 times
Reputation: 11707
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
I have to wander when both parents died and if they had notified and if she was benefitted by estate that then owed the money? I have a feeling there maybe more than we read there all told.
I am not sure in this article's situation, but have recently read that a lot of the overpayments happen when a child is due a death benefit due to a parent, overpaid that benefit, and now "owes" it back. Generally, the payment was issued to a guardian on behalf of the minor child. Any notification of debt back in the day likely went to the guardian as well.

I am sure there are other scenarios as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2014, 05:58 AM
 
43,706 posts, read 44,464,744 times
Reputation: 20585
I have heard of this happening overseas in the case of a foreign government trying to collect a tax debt from someone's inheritance years after the original person died and the inheritance was gone already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2014, 02:00 PM
Zot
 
Location: 3rd rock from a nearby star
468 posts, read 681,981 times
Reputation: 747
This shouldn't be Constitutional. Holding the fiscal interactions of a parent adverse to a child seems ludicrous to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2014, 04:42 PM
 
1,871 posts, read 2,099,976 times
Reputation: 2913
We need to stop the insanity of this madness. If this is true that it was removed from the latest farm bill and no one will admit to putting it in there. The person who did this should be fired. Just absolutely disgusting and this is making my blood boil right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top