Quote:
Originally Posted by notmeofficer
The chick is the face of meth... and while I know some potheads that look like that it is more the gene pool than pot
Anyone who would subject their dog to getting high is a sick puppy all the way around
I dont like drugs.. any drug.. pot included.. it increases my workload... if it becomes legal it will still increase my workload... if it gets taken out of granny 12 plants backyard and taken over by Monsanto it will still increase my workload.. even with all the money that will go to LEO should it become legal.... no way is it good for society.. dopers will still scam the system...
I could get behind it more if potheads would give up social welfare and any health problems that might come from its use... (like we see in our ER's) but they wont.. they want free medical and welfare and get high and zone out too
NO WAY JOSE
|
You know what? No matter what thread you post this nonsense in, I am not going to let you get away with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by notmeofficer
if it becomes legal it will still increase my workload...
|
That is simply not true. Most of the flimsy reasons you stand on as reasons why prohibition should remain in place will go away when prohibition ends. You are just too biased to see it.
Your "reality" when it comes to cannabis is based solely on the asshats you deal with every day. They are irresponsible people doing irresponsible things. But 90% of all the cannabis users out there are people you never come into contact with, because they are responsible people that use it responsibly. However, you blindly and admittedly lump all of them together, stating that
all of them are irresponsible, non-productive citizens who cannot be trusted. You don't know how wrong you are, and actually
you are the one being quite irresponsible because you are the one with the gun, the power, and the authority to ruin peoples lives because of your terribly myopic view of all cannabis users.
Quote:
Originally Posted by notmeofficer
I could get behind it more if potheads would give up social welfare and any health problems that might come from its use... (like we see in our ER's) but they wont.. they want free medical and welfare and get high and zone out too
|
What a load of garbage! Please show where our ER's are getting loaded down with cannabis users. Sorry, but that isn't happening sir, and as is normal for you, you shoot yourself in the foot every time you try to spread such falsehoods.
Also, please show where our social and medical programs are getting overrun by people in poor health because of cannabis use. Sorry again sir. You are making stuff up again, just like you did in the Colorado thread. Remember your comments about counties that supposedly "want nothing to do with cannabis" and that have "banned it altogether"?
Here is a quote made by you from that same Colorado thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by notmeofficer
The article states... which is better...and the conclusion....WITH caveats is that mj is the better of the two substances... which I agree with...
Do I want doper behavior or alcoholics surrounding me... no
Which one is more destructive to my community right now.... marijuana by far... alcohol is highly controlled
|
So you said it yourself. Because alcohol is highly regulated and controlled it is by far the lesser of the two problems. Yet you steadfastly refuse to see that the same benefits from regulation and control apply to cannabis also.
That is your acute myopia rearing its ugly head again...