Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The house, in fact, does not always win. But the regulations are tailored so that it will, on balance, win more than it loses. The fact that this seems to be news to some people is rather sad.
If a player wins big, how can he prove he didn't take advantage of house incompetence to get an edge? What's to prevent the house from using that theory to recover all big winnings in court? The burden of proof should be on the house, to prove the player violated an explicit rule. If there is no need to prove any violation of any explicit rule, what's to keep the winnings themselves from becoming circumstantial evidence of getting an edge? "We pay out all small winnings. Good luck. If you want to win big, good luck in court."
Educate yourself, for God's sake. State gambling regulations prevent the use of the edging technique that the players used to win.
.
Don't see how this isn't a personal attack even though it is completely incorrect. Please support your "fact" with the exact gaming law. The casinos will say it is cheating but that doesn't make it a regulation.
The two players in questions did not commit any crime. They exploited a method to gain an advantage against the house. They were only able to do so by asking special request to the dealers that the house didn't catch until later on.
If the dealer was in the game then all should be punished. Cheating is cheating and I have no skin in such a game. I feel all these cheats should pay. I don't have any negativity towards the casinos since you know going in they have the upper hand. Pros can win some money, but if you get an employee involved you have to pay up. Sorry, but it is what it is.
To hell with casinos. They should all be shut down. There evil places that destroy lives. House always wins...Preying on human weaknesses. Just my opinion and view.
Educate yourself, for God's sake. State gambling regulations prevent the use of the edging technique that the players used to win.
So the edging technique is well known? The house knows about it? But leaves it in place? As a trap for unwary gamblers? To deceive them into thinking they can get an edge, and then, when they do, taking it back in court? But that implies the house always knows when players use that edge. Wouldn't the players know the house knows? And wouldn't they know they would lose in court? Then why do they do it? Something doesn't add up.
Don't see how this isn't a personal attack even though it is completely incorrect. Please support your "fact" with the exact gaming law. The casinos will say it is cheating but that doesn't make it a regulation.
Wouldn't the courts finding be a clue to you that the players did something against some regulation or rule?
Or do you think the court made an arbitrary decision not based upon law?
Evil, legalized robbery. Casinos are houses of the devil. Shut em down. Got to love those Native American casinos. Legalized robbery. All of them. Screw the casino....May the players win so much that they have to shut these temples of darkness down. Amen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
