Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2015, 10:48 AM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,558,959 times
Reputation: 2207

Advertisements

What do you think??

Judging from prices I say it's on the bubble side.

So what on earth happened and after 7 years there's a bubble again??

Market seems beyond reason.

And why chinese would buy houses in US??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2015, 11:07 AM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,403,413 times
Reputation: 18729
Default Well first you need to be a little clearer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
What do you think?? While "what I think" is sometimes interesting, the DATA is more important...

Judging from prices I say it's on the bubble side.Data on JUST PRICES is insufficent to say there is a bubble. When it comes to housing the value of information about SPECIFIC local conditions is KEY. Among that most valuable part of that DATA is percentage of household income needed to purchase home and HOW MUCH OF THE POPULATION in locations is ABOVE critical thresholds...

So what on earth happened and after 7 years there's a bubble again?? There is insufficient space to really detail every action over the past 7+ years, but it is quite clear that LOADS of bad housing debt has been backstopped by implicit consent of Fannie & Freddie, as well as explicit decisions of the Federal Reserve to manage for low rates...

Market seems beyond reason.See above, local data is what matters

And why chinese would buy houses in US??Investors that are rational evaluate alternatives. If there is foreign investment in houses (and that is big if...) it would suggest likely returns (and other benefits...) exceed alternatives

Here is the data that shows what sorts income is necessary in various markets to afford a median priced home -- http://www.realtor.org/sites/default...2015-05-11.pdf No arguements that in some areas it is very high. That said, the data about household incomes in those same areas is similarly pretty solid -- Median household income

The specific circumstance that occurred in the the implosion of 2008 are not likely to be repeated -- there is widespread agreement that it is no longer possible for the government to avoid the choices between widespread home ownership for high risk borrowers AND financial stability -- Deconstruction delays | The Economist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 11:14 AM
 
493 posts, read 443,012 times
Reputation: 445
I see soft landing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 11:34 AM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,558,959 times
Reputation: 2207
Data is surely important.

But sometimes I believe it to be somewhat cooked.

Particularly income and unemployment numbers.

Another View Of The Real "UNEMPLOYMENT RATE" In This Country - Exploring the News

You can also check these.

The Warren Buffett Economy——Why Its Days Are Numbered (Part 4) | David Stockman's Contra Corner

Chapwood Index - The Real Cost of Living Increase Index | Founded by Ed Butowsky of Chapwood Investments
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 11:47 AM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,655,355 times
Reputation: 1091
There hasn't been a housing bubble or crash in recent memory. The Great Recession was born and raised from a credit crisis that was knowingly and deliberately produced by cowboy capitalists on Wall Street.

Housing markets meanwhile did nothing but behave exactly as they should have. Recall that between mid-2000 and mid-2003, home mortgage rates declined by 335 basis points. Given that asset prices and interest rates are inversely related, what would you have expected to see happen as the result? How about when interest rates rose again between mid-2004 and mid-2006?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 12:04 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,558,959 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Barbara View Post
There hasn't been a housing bubble or crash in recent memory. The Great Recession was born and raised from a credit crisis that was knowingly and deliberately produced by cowboy capitalists on Wall Street.

Housing markets meanwhile did nothing but behave exactly as they should have. Recall that between mid-2000 and mid-2003, home mortgage rates declined by 335 basis points. Given that asset prices and interest rates are inversely related, what would you have expected to see happen as the result? How about when interest rates rose again between mid-2004 and mid-2006?
If rates go up then a normalisation could be expected.

But to be honest I don't imagine rates going up drastically where supply and demand meets.

Decent rate range can be between 3% to 5%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 12:20 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,206,701 times
Reputation: 57822
As long as demand exceeds supply, as in our area, prices will continue to rise, currently over 10%/year. The problem in 2008 was the many bad loans that were given to people who couldn't afford them, especially the "interest only for 5 years"
and the many people that refinanced and took out cash for vacations, cars or other things they couldn't afford. While large layoffs by the one major employer (Boeing) could have a dramatic effect on housing prices here, the economy is much more diverse now with so many other big employers such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Costco. Yes, it could happen, but the circumstances that caused the housing crisis in 2008 do not exist now or in the near future. The Chinese who have money are investing. Where else can you get 10% a year on your money? In the case of Vancouver, B.C., it's as much as 12.2% on the east side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 12:36 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
As long as demand exceeds supply, as in our area, prices will continue to rise, currently over 10%/year. The problem in 2008 was the many bad loans that were given to people who couldn't afford them, especially the "interest only for 5 years"
and the many people that refinanced and took out cash for vacations, cars or other things they couldn't afford. While large layoffs by the one major employer (Boeing) could have a dramatic effect on housing prices here, the economy is much more diverse now with so many other big employers such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Costco. Yes, it could happen, but the circumstances that caused the housing crisis in 2008 do not exist now or in the near future. The Chinese who have money are investing. Where else can you get 10% a year on your money? In the case of Vancouver, B.C., it's as much as 12.2% on the east side.


IO Arms weren't really an issue. People misunderstand the crisis and blame them but it was more exotic arms and pick a payment loans combined with ALt-a/no docs that were the issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,427,707 times
Reputation: 10111
No. The bubble was caused by ARM mortgage and packaging abuse. People who couldnt afford the mortgages were being approved then sold off as junk loans on Wallstreet. Borrowers relied upon ARM rates to remain low so that they could refinance out of the loans, however the Fed raised the interest rates too high and the borrowers could no longer afford the loans. This was done in very high numbers. Thats a bubble, too many bad loans driving up housing prices via demand. What we have now is simply housing prices going up due to legitimate demand like cash investors and borrowers under stricter borrowing standards, its not a bubble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 12:59 PM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,114,612 times
Reputation: 18603
Borrowing has been really difficult for a number of years. A repeat of 2008 is very unlikely. Remember that housing construction has been way down since 2008. That will have an effect. Supply is down. As more people recover from 2008, demand will go up. Prices will go up and will eventually stimulate a construction boom. When that happens, then you can start to worry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top