Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-02-2010, 07:20 AM
 
78,432 posts, read 60,613,724 times
Reputation: 49733

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
If they don't have the wherewithal (personnel, etc) to do the repos, tough for them.
"Them" is "us".

I know you are anti-government and taxes but don't cut off your nose to spite your face.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2010, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,974,809 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
"Them" is "us".

I know you are anti-government and taxes but don't cut off your nose to spite your face.

I am pro-responsible-government. I am for social service agencies for those that truly need them (unlike the TP's and elephants, I would not eliminate them). I am not anti-tax. I am anti-irresponsible in fiscal matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 08:28 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,200,443 times
Reputation: 4801
WSJ just had a piece on this, I think they called it The Secret Stimulus.

It was referring to the many people still living in homes that they hadn't paid mortgage on in over six months, and how that both enables them to have housing and use that money they would be spending on housing to buy other things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,974,809 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
WSJ just had a piece on this, I think they called it The Secret Stimulus.

It was referring to the many people still living in homes that they hadn't paid mortgage on in over six months, and how that both enables them to have housing and use that money they would be spending on housing to buy other things.
As I say, what happens at the top usually happens at the bottom. Posters like to attack the bottom but are curiously silent about the top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 10:50 AM
 
78,432 posts, read 60,613,724 times
Reputation: 49733
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
I am pro-responsible-government. I am for social service agencies for those that truly need them (unlike the TP's and elephants, I would not eliminate them). I am not anti-tax. I am anti-irresponsible in fiscal matters.
Your earlier post clearly indicates that if the local governtment is too inept or unwilling or whatever to collect from the delinquent tax owners then so be it.

This means that you and I would either wind up paying higher property taxes or would receive less service for our tax monies due to budget shortfalls.

Sounds like a free ride for irresponsible government to me.

A number of people that skip town on their property taxes are pretty much out of the reach of the local authority. Another reason why resorting to a big national collections agency may become neccessary.

I guess that since I have a loan officer in my family (small town bank) that I get to hear all about how people skip town, write bad checks for items and move etc etc etc so I'm just well aware that with a small percentage of the population you have to play hardball.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 10:54 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,200,443 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
Posters like to attack the bottom but are curiously silent about the top.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 10:56 AM
 
78,432 posts, read 60,613,724 times
Reputation: 49733
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
As I say, what happens at the top usually happens at the bottom. Posters like to attack the bottom but are curiously silent about the top.
Now we are talking about bailouts and the fraud\ineptness of banks etc? (We've beaten those to death here and as a group aren't real happy about it.)

THIS thread topic is using a collection agency to collect property taxes.

If someone stops paying their loan (even if they can afford too) that's 100% legal and that's the way loans work.

However, if they don't pay property taxes then that's a different type of obligation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 11:07 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,200,443 times
Reputation: 4801
I also don't understand how it is attacking the bottom.

Some people are certainly attacking the very small percentage of "the bottom" that aren't paying their property taxes like the rest, I submit they're also quite willing to attack someone from "the top" that isn't paying their property taxes.

It has nothing to do with class/status/quintile and that is a really lazy way to label posters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,974,809 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
A number of people that skip town on their property taxes are pretty much out of the reach of the local authority. Another reason why resorting to a big national collections agency may become neccessary.

I guess that since I have a loan officer in my family (small town bank) that I get to hear all about how people skip town, write bad checks for items and move etc etc etc so I'm just well aware that with a small percentage of the population you have to play hardball.
Oh please. I do not think elderly Mr. and Mrs. Smith are going to "skip town" on their property taxes in the middle of the night. They are in fact not going to "skip" anywhere. If someone does skip town, the town can take their property and make some money to pay items on their ridiculous out of proportion school budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2010, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,974,809 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Top = corporations, banks, you know

Bottom = us
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top