Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-31-2010, 01:49 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,555,173 times
Reputation: 4949

Advertisements

Could be Really Good Times for the folks who Actively-Choose-In-Advance to go off Oil.

But that takes some foresight, planning, ambition and actual activity.

Sooooo . . . The US is probably pretty much screwed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2011, 02:55 AM
 
Location: USA
2,593 posts, read 4,242,174 times
Reputation: 2240
Any hopes of a recovery will be crushed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 07:27 AM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,295,627 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
It could be that it's the other way around - that the price of oil follows the economy.
That is a wag the dog scenario. The cost of energy is the single most important factor in any economy. 1 gallon of gasoline provides the same energy as 500 man hours. Cheap energy translates to high production and profits. Expensive energy translates to lower production at higher costs and lower profits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,338,228 times
Reputation: 5382
Kunstler is something of a strange bird. I read his weekly rants if for no other reasons than I find them amusing and it's always good to see an alternative differing, and non conformist view that at least on the surface doesn't appear to be the ravings of a lunatic.

That said, I'm with you in that I'm not really sure exactly what he's driving at. He is at least somewhat in touch with reality, at least somewhat educated, and clearly very articulate. But his mantra of "sustaining the unsustianable" is so often repeated that it's become cliched and lost much of its impact (try finding an entry on his site that doesn't contain that phrase or some variant of it. That's like finding a virgin in a night club). Clearly he has some kind of axe to grind, though exactly what I have yet to determine. As much as he belittles and counts the days of modern civilization, he doesn't appear to not be using it; if his entries are to be believed, he's sure been traipsing the country and the globe a lot (via oil powered automobiles and jetliners) lately. He even capitulated to this double standard of "do as I say, not as I do" by rationalizing his actions by saying "well the plane would've operated anyway with or without me".

That may be true Mr Kunstler, but you have no idea how ruinous those actions have been to your credibility and legitimacy in recent months. Maybe he just doesn't care, which makes me wonder why he's really pissed off. I don't know. Maybe he hasn't slept with a woman since the Reagan Administration. A lot of male anger and frustration can usually be traced back to a sexual tension of some sort. Also, while he's good at providing a synopsis of current and recent world events (hindsight is 20/20 though), fewer and fewer of his predictions are coming true. Though I agree with him 100% on his bulletpoints of how we are being swindled left and right and how most of America is just too consumed with "Biggest Losers", "Dancing Stars", and Justin Bieber to even notice-let alone give a damn. I agree. As a nation, we've turned into a bunch of short sighted, selective-memory idiots.

He is right about one other thing though: there is way too much waste and frivolity when it comes to energy and transportation. The HSR abomination here in CA is a 24 karat example of that. What it really represents is a new method to an old habit. Maybe there really is too much mobility here. Would ending the 500 mile shopping trip, 1500 mile salad, 2500 mile trip to see Uncle Buford, and the 3500 mile trip to lay on the beach really be such a bad thing (as Mr Kunstler has asked)?

Which takes me back to some of the points in this discussion. Americans as a whole are very emotional (read: irrational) when it comes to gas prices. Don't be so quick to write our economic obituary just yet. Let gas go to $5, $7, or even $15. Very possible to see before the end of this new decade. We'll demand "action", and throw Kunstler-esque temper tantrums every step of the way. But guess what? We'll still pay it. Even if we all turn to electric cars that end up doubling or tripling our electric bills. We won't care. The prevailing (irrational) mentality here is that we have absolutely no problem paying an extra $100 a month for food and electricty if it means not spending an extra $2 for a gallon of gas.

Spending a dollar to save a dime?

Sounds illogical.

But we ARE an illogical nation. And when it comes to what we think is dodging high[er] gas prices, we will not only do it, but do it with a smile on our face.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 05:06 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,555,173 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
Kunstler is something of a strange bird. . . . .
Well, no argument either way with most of that. From what I have seen, Full Doomers sort of worship him as a demigod, and there is not a lot of sense to be found in most of that.

But when you get to this part . . .

Quote:

But guess what? We'll still pay it. Even if we all turn to electric cars that end up doubling or tripling our electric bills. We won't care. The prevailing (irrational) mentality here is that we have absolutely no problem paying an extra $100 a month for food and electricty if it means not spending an extra $2 for a gallon of gas.

Spending a dollar to save a dime?

Sounds illogical.

But we ARE an illogical nation. And when it comes to what we think is dodging high[er] gas prices, we will not only do it, but do it with a smile on our face.
Well, it is a little bit illogical. Because that is not what the math says. I know some folk like to argue belief over math, but that gets back to Kunsler-esque thinking?

While your mileage may vary about 50 cents worth of electricity can get you as far as $3.00 (a gallon) of gas.

Going electric with the cars, and ground transportation in general, saves money, cleans the air, and stops the money from bleeding out of US.

But other than that, it is a crazy idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 05:11 PM
 
Location: North of the border!
661 posts, read 1,252,083 times
Reputation: 1303
Five bucks would be bad? Here in Canada we pay $1.10-$1.20 a litre. Figure it out. Our economy is doing pretty good compared to the US. There are bigger troubles afoot for you guys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,985,971 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
My question is, how will that change effect the economy? Will it crash and burn, or bloom when as-of-yet unrealized opportunities are opened by new technologies? Maybe somewhere in the middle?

How do you see the game changing as a result of ever-increasing fuel prices?
1. Prices of everything produced with the dinosaur method of fossil fuels will soar, making food and many commodities out of the reach of many of us.

2. New technologies will spawn, but not get off the ground because of lobbying against them (big oil).*

3. Masses of people will suffer from this, and also from more lost jobs outsourced.

4. Suburbia and countryside will die (see the movie through netflix: The End of Suburbia). Well to do professionals will purchase in-town, in-city condos and others will be more or less stranded unless they have the money for car gas.

5. * Hopefully we'll run past Peak and downhill on oil reserves and will be forced into new technologies, and this will be a techno revolution in which millions will not be trained and will not have work. Upside: clean energy.
The coming techno revolution will be akin in some ways to the Gutenberg (printing) Press invention, the Industrial Revolution and the Digital Revolution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,985,971 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post

The power grid as it is would not support 200 million electric cars, but we could fill in the gaps with more nuclear power, solar power on private homes, and even more coal fired plants as a stop-gap measure. It would be difficult, but not impossible...

Nuclear???? COAL????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,985,971 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincolnian View Post
The $147 a barrel oil was the death nail in 2008. A fragile recovery cannot handle high oil prices. OPEC knew it wasn't in their best interest to push oil beyond $100 because it would accelerate exploration of alternatives and conservation.

If it spikes to $5 most Americans will scream like they did last time.
Americans should be screaming now. It is greed, not need, that is driving up the costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 06:26 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,189,134 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
5. * Hopefully we'll run past Peak and downhill on oil reserves and will be forced into new technologies, and this will be a techno revolution in which millions will not be trained and will not have work. Upside: clean energy.
You mean millions of Americans who are products of their idiotic education system. The rest of the world will do just fine.

It'll be 100 years before you run out of reserves. There's 5 times more oil in the 'Stans than there is in the Middle East, but it will take decades to build the infrastructure and start producing at the same level as the Saudi Arabia or Kuwait.

There's 100 times more oil than the Middle East in the eastern Russian Republics and untapped coal reserves that are as big as the eastern US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top