Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2018, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Texas
13,480 posts, read 8,398,556 times
Reputation: 25948

Advertisements

I think there will always be so-called inequalities amongst people no matter what.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2018, 09:50 AM
 
9,376 posts, read 6,993,181 times
Reputation: 14777
Income inequality goes far beyond CEO vs blue collar.

Those who can work for themselves can do far better in life than working as a cog for “the man”. It takes hard work, ingenuity, and a bit of risk taking to make it on your own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2018, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,882,803 times
Reputation: 15839
Quote:
Originally Posted by PriscillaVanilla View Post
I think there will always be so-called inequalities amongst people no matter what.
Thank goodness!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2018, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,668 posts, read 6,604,835 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
It's noteworthy that none of those who rant about "Income Inequality" can point to any negative consequences in the economy.
What does "negative consequences in the economy" even mean? If we can keep per capita GDP at near the 200 year historic rate by escalating public and private debt, finance, and "free" trade does that count as "no ill effects"? This is clearly not a sustainable economy. Then add in the fact that only the top ~1% of the population is even matching that GDP/capita increase due to rising disparity, and it's safe to say that the economic consequences are huge for the citizens of this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2018, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,485 posts, read 61,466,561 times
Reputation: 30451
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
What does "negative consequences in the economy" even mean? If we can keep per capita GDP at near the 200 year historic rate by escalating public and private debt, finance, and "free" trade does that count as "no ill effects"? This is clearly not a sustainable economy. Then add in the fact that only the top ~1% of the population is even matching that GDP/capita increase due to rising disparity, and it's safe to say that the economic consequences are huge for the citizens of this country.
Eventually the pendulum will have to swing the other way. That 'top 1%' will fade as some different system or group will fill the void.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2018, 09:47 PM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,668 posts, read 6,604,835 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
Eventually the pendulum will have to swing the other way. That 'top 1%' will fade as some different system or group will fill the void.
Actually no. If AI gets advanced enough to technically unemploy a significant fraction of the population, it will only get worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2018, 09:50 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,286 posts, read 87,483,906 times
Reputation: 55564
Literacy, work ethic, & cessation of crime acts
Serving your community instead of preying on it
Just guessing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 12:03 PM
 
1,514 posts, read 892,402 times
Reputation: 1961
Almost half of US families can not afford basics like rent and food:
43% of U.S. families can't afford basics of middle class life

A few excerpts from the article:

"Nearly 51 million households don't earn enough to afford a monthly budget that includes housing, food, child care, health care, transportation and a cell phone, according to a study released Thursday by the United Way ALICE Project. That's 43% of households in the United States."

"Despite seemingly positive economic signs, the ALICE data shows that financial hardship is still a pervasive problem," said Stephanie Hoopes, the project's director."

- End article excerpts

I guess almost half of Americans don't deserve a living wage as a bare minimum because they are (according to some on this forum):

1. Illiterate
2. Have poor work ethic
3. Have a criminal record
4. Not educated enough
4. (Insert another excuse here)

Even with that large percentage of people (roughly half of US households) struggling to make basic ends meet: Move along folks, nothing to see here. Never mind the man behind the curtain. There is not an income inequality problem in this country. Half of Americans deserve the spot they are in (not making a living wage as a minimum) despite them working a full time job. Only a percentage of people deserve a living wage if they work full time, not everybody. Screw em. After all, half of the US must be illiterate, poor work ethic, criminal record (insert another excuse here).

Look, the sooner we wake up and realize that all humans are intrinsically greedy (to one degree or another - myself included) and have a tendency to take more then what we need, that we tend to make laws, environments and policies to favor this and the sooner we realize that the important thing is taking care of the greater good (each person), instead of placing most of the wealth in the hands of the few (corporations/people), the better off we will be as a civilization.

We still have time. We can do this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,485 posts, read 61,466,561 times
Reputation: 30451
Quote:
Originally Posted by txbullsfan View Post
Almost half of US families can not afford basics like rent and food:
43% of U.S. families can't afford basics of middle class life
That explains why we see some many people in the US starving.

It is an epidemic, no wait that is obesity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 06:46 PM
 
1,534 posts, read 2,425,038 times
Reputation: 4198
The Fed should raise the minimum wage so that it reflects the "inflation" we have seen for the past number years since the last adjustment. Same adjustment in SS should be done to the minimum wage.


We have allowed business to be be subsidized by the low wages because of our keeping the minimum wage low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top