Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2018, 11:59 AM
 
3,528 posts, read 6,532,036 times
Reputation: 1454

Advertisements

You can go to Google Image Search and type "Cy Twombly Untitled Red."

Yes, somebody paid $46M for it. People buy these things because they know they can resell it later for a profit. It's not because somebody wanted to look at it every day. It's like, somebody a few years ago paid over $7M for a stamp. It wasn't an especially pretty stamp. It's an investment.

For people who think most modern art is silly - from an artistic standpoint, do you even think that's a good painting?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2018, 03:24 PM
 
9,509 posts, read 4,344,731 times
Reputation: 10585
I don't get it, but my taste in art is apparently non-existent. Seems like a risky way to invest $46M, though.



Personally, I don't like it. I'm not one of those people hate all abstract art - its just that this particular piece does nothing for me. In fact, I don't think I'd take it for free if there were a stipulation attached that I had to display it prominently in my home. It gives me headache just looking at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2018, 03:30 PM
 
501 posts, read 303,590 times
Reputation: 245
This from the same artist sold for $70M. Nuts. Whatever.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2018, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Ontario, NY
3,515 posts, read 7,784,031 times
Reputation: 4292
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpasa View Post
You can go to Google Image Search and type "Cy Twombly Untitled Red."

Yes, somebody paid $46M for it. People buy these things because they know they can resell it later for a profit.
Art is a very risky investment, not all art increases in value. As tastes change, Art can go significantly up or down in value. And it's not like stocks, Art that is "out of favor" could remain that way for decades or longer. Some Art is also purchased by "uneducated" art collectors, they way over pay for something, giving them bragging rights, look how rich I am, I paid X million dollars for this. When fortunes change, that same Art is often sold at fire sale prices, to raise capital.


One case in point would be David Lee Edwards, after winning the lottery for 27 million dollars after taxes, he burned through 12 million dollars in his first year alone. Besides cars and mansions, one thing he brought was Art, wildly over paying, when he ran out of money and was looking to raise cash, his Art was sold for pennies on the dollar. There have been far more wealthy sports stars and instant internet millionaires that met with the same fate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2018, 02:04 AM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
7,087 posts, read 8,637,620 times
Reputation: 9978
Hahaha the world of art is amazing to me. Most of the stuff that sells for huge sums, even just huge to me ($20-100K), is usually very bad. It’s not interesting to see whatsoever and not special. I have bought a lot of original art I love from an artist named James Dunbar and paid $250-500 usually except for a large custom piece we specifically had commissioned. I think it’s better than stuff 100 times the price lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2018, 02:13 AM
 
Location: on the wind
23,306 posts, read 18,852,325 times
Reputation: 75322
Old sayings:

"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

And this one:

"The more you pay the more it's worth."

Sad thing is, most likely the buyer doesn't get much feeling out of any work they buy. Just the bragging rights about how much it cost them. Even sadder for true masterpieces (oh, something like a Vermeer) is that they end up locked away in a secure, sterile vault where no one can get any pleasure out of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2018, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
I hope that whoever spent $46 million on this thing, takes a bath on the purchase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2018, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Maryland
2,269 posts, read 1,640,301 times
Reputation: 5200
Yeah, many things should probably be called “graphic investments” or “money laundering parchments” instead of art because it is really about the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2018, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,636 posts, read 9,464,279 times
Reputation: 22978
I don't understand expensive art but hey, it's their money.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TechGromit View Post
Art is a very risky investment, not all art increases in value.
Anyone rich enough to pay $46 million for a painting, is probably smart enough to do their research and make sure the painting hold its value.

Hell if the painting becomes worthless tomorrow, they'll still be rich. Every potential reward with investment comes with risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2018, 02:26 PM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,705,240 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpasa View Post
You can go to Google Image Search and type "Cy Twombly Untitled Red."

Yes, somebody paid $46M for it. People buy these things because they know they can resell it later for a profit. It's not because somebody wanted to look at it every day. It's like, somebody a few years ago paid over $7M for a stamp. It wasn't an especially pretty stamp. It's an investment.

For people who think most modern art is silly - from an artistic standpoint, do you even think that's a good painting?
i would love to know how someone determines a value for something like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top