Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2010, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,036,241 times
Reputation: 62204

Advertisements

"The economy is booming in North Dakota because of oil. Unemployment is only 3.7% there. Jobs are so plentiful that there is a bidding war for workers among employers. Motels are booked for months in advance. Home builders are working double shifts. The state has a budget surplus of close to $1 billion dollars."

Democrats Face Skeptics in Rural Midwest - WSJ.com

In other words, North Dakotans are doing swell. So why are their Democrat incumbent candidates facing tough sledding in the 2010 elections? Because the people don't like the way the country is heading. They're angry about bank and auto bailouts, the stimulus, the Obamacare party line vote, and amnesty talk. They're making money and they want to keep it.

My question to you has nothing to do with North Dakota, actually. The lame national news media is covering process not issues in the 2010 elections. They're only covering tight races and how those candidates advertise, debate, hold meetings and criticize their opponents. They nationalize all issues. The national polls don't even ask questions about local issues. (Example: When was the last time you saw a poll question about crime.) We, the national audience, have no sense of the hot local issues in each state, something the media could actually do if they got off of their NY and DC backsides, and away from their charts and poll data, and visited each state prior to Election day.

I want to know if you think that the Congressional elections in your state have more to do with national or local issues. If it's local, tell us what those local issues are. Possible examples: corruption, water rights, declining standard test scores in education, crime, etc.

Last edited by LauraC; 09-27-2010 at 06:03 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2010, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,797,202 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"The economy is booming in North Dakota because of oil. Unemployment is only 3.7% there. Jobs are so plentiful that there is a bidding war for workers among employers. Motels are booked for months in advance. Home builders are working double shifts. The state has a budget surplus of close to $1 billion dollars."

Democrats Face Skeptics in Rural Midwest - WSJ.com

In other words, North Dakotans are doing swell. So why are their Democrat incumbent candidates facing tough sledding in the 2010 elections? Because the people don't like the way the country is heading. They're angry about bank and auto bailouts, the stimulus, the Obamacare party line vote, and amnesty talk. They're making money and they want to keep it.

My question to you has nothing to do with North Dakota, actually. The lame national news media is covering process not issues in the 2010 elections. They're only covering tight races and how those candidates advertise, debate, hold meetings and criticize their opponents. They nationalize all issues. The national polls don't even ask questions about local issues. (Example: When was the last time you saw a poll question about crime.) We, the national audience, have no sense of the hot local issues in each state, something the media could actually do if they got off of their NY and DC backsides, and away from their charts and poll data, and visited each state prior to Election day.

I want to know if you think that the Congressional elections in your state have more to do with national or local issues. If it's local, tell us what those local issues are. Possible examples: corruption, water rights, declining standard test scores in education, crime, etc.
I think here in AR it is more about national politics. Why do I say that? Because for the first time in I don't know how long, we are about to elect a Republican senator as well as maybe 2 or even 3 Republican reps. The people here upset with the incmubants, mostly due to things like health care.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2010, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,539,575 times
Reputation: 7807
It depends upon who's running.

For our Republican's, they're nearly all trying to make it about national issues, mostly Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama.

I guess they've forgotten the first rule of politics: "All elections are local."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2010, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,823,758 times
Reputation: 35920
It's mostly local here in Colorado. There are several tax issues on the ballot, a "personhood" issue declaring a fertilized egg a person, school taxes. That's just what I can think of off the top of my head after a long day at work.

There are several Tea Party candidates running on the Repub ticket, but it's not their Tea Party affiliation that is being discussed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2010, 05:23 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,036,241 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
It depends upon who's running.

For our Republican's, they're nearly all trying to make it about national issues, mostly Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama.

I guess they've forgotten the first rule of politics: "All elections are local."
But North Dakota is an example of where it's not local. Those people, compared to the rest of the country, are doing really well because of oil (notice I did not say solar panels, windmills, etc.) and they aren't voting Democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2010, 05:30 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,865,913 times
Reputation: 4585
National, to be sure. Basic issue, vote to derail Recovery or continue Recovery. Your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2010, 07:28 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"The economy is booming in North Dakota because of oil. Unemployment is only 3.7% there. Jobs are so plentiful that there is a bidding war for workers among employers. Motels are booked for months in advance. Home builders are working double shifts. The state has a budget surplus of close to $1 billion dollars."



In other words, North Dakotans are doing swell. So why are their Democrat incumbent candidates facing tough sledding in the 2010 elections?



State legislature are much different than the federal legislatures.

ND house has a Conservative majority 58-35
ND Senate has a Conservative majority 26-21
ND Governor is a Conservative

So it goes to reason, the Progressives they sent to the federal legislature, are going the opposite way of the strong state economy.
North Dakotan's plan to change that so they don't become part of the embarrassment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2010, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,036,241 times
Reputation: 62204
After reading about ND, I'm thinking the answer to the problem economy is back to drill, baby, drill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2010, 08:21 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
After reading about ND, I'm thinking the answer to the problem economy is back to drill, baby, drill.


Look what happened to our economy when gas was over $4 a gal. It got the ball rolling downhill, fast.

Oil is cheap, the refining is where we lack capacity. Refining is what makes fuel so expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2010, 09:16 AM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,200,528 times
Reputation: 8266
In Minnesota, the Governor's race seems to be more local ( state issues) while the US congress races are stricly national issues.

Our 6th District race ( Michele Bachmann vs Tarryl Clark) seems to be the " nastinest" with a lot of misleading ads.

Bachmann holds a 9 point lead and has held that same margin since July ( before either party started bombarded us with ads)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top