Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So you are afraid of the man in the picture because he is white, or is it more likely you found the photo and used it because of all of the tatoos on him?
I used it because of the tattoos, that's his identity attitire and it says something about his attitulde if he has to deal with me, if I saw this guy would I feel much different?..no I wouldn't http://www.gangstagroup.com/sub/gang...8d12fcd558.jpg
Last edited by Green Irish Eyes; 05-15-2011 at 03:02 PM..
Reason: Copyright violation -- if it's not YOUR picture, please don't post it.
I am talking about the laws in this thread. That a private business cannot put up a sign like "Blacks not allowed" just as a private business in Germany cannot put up the Nazi symbol in their store. Both laws reflect on historical events in the two countries.
But you never answered my question: why do you need the government to tell you what to do, or not do, when you already know? I believe in you more than you do.
I used it because of the tattoos, that's his identity attitire and it says something about his attitulde if he has to deal with me, if I saw this guy would I feel much different?..no I wouldn't
And again, if the man was following me down the street, I'd be a little concerned as well, and I'm white.. Again, the keyword here is being followed down the street, not the fact that the individual following me would be white, black, or even tattoos.. Heck, I'd be a little concerned if I had police officers following me down the road as well..
The fact that there are a few minority individuals in this nation who are 'racist', doesnt demand that we have a law saying you cant be racist. Clearly such laws havent done very well at rooting out racism, has it? Furthermore, despite laws saying we could be racist, (i.e. previous laws limiting interacial marriages for example), this hasnt kept people racist and limited biracial children, has it?
I don't want my 3 year old little girl hearing the "f" bomb, may be you do, I don't.
Its beeped out after a certain hour as well when your 3 year old should be in bed. Anyways, if you don't want your 3 year old to hear the f-word, you have the right to turn off the TV. That is freedom, right?
"All rights are individuals. We do not get our rights because we belong to a group. Whether it’s homosexuals, women, minorities, it leads us astray. You don’t get your rights belonging to your group. A group can’t force themselves on anybody else. So there should be no affirmative action for any group.
This violates the principle on the importance of the individual, and confuses us about the importance of individual rights, which is the purpose of the Constitution. Defend our individual rights."-Ron Paul
Perhaps the problem for a lot of droids is the idea of the individual and personal freedom....not being part of group 'X' and being yourself....
Does she do anything anymore other than lie and hack video together?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
