U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-09-2011, 04:24 PM
 
841 posts, read 809,470 times
Reputation: 186

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Squaring off!

New World Order vs Old World Sanity.

This is it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-09-2011, 05:12 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 3,360,148 times
Reputation: 545
The answer to 1984 is 1776...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2011, 11:25 PM
 
8,758 posts, read 8,842,430 times
Reputation: 1428
According to a certain news correspondent who was at the debate, this exchange was less than friendly. Evidently, Perry was really letting Ron Paul have it. Ron Paul was going after Perry pretty hard in the debate though so fair is fair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2011, 11:27 PM
 
Location: Chicago
865 posts, read 572,003 times
Reputation: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7 View Post
According to a certain news correspondent who was at the debate, this exchange was less than friendly. Evidently, Perry was really letting Ron Paul have it. Ron Paul was going after Perry pretty hard in the debate though so fair is fair.
Anything to make a story.

Who is this certain correspondent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2011, 11:29 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
6,175 posts, read 3,494,452 times
Reputation: 3798
As far as I'm concerned Perry could have been saying "Here, pull my finger, doc".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 12:00 AM
 
8,758 posts, read 8,842,430 times
Reputation: 1428
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadeInAmerica View Post
Anything to make a story.

Who is this certain correspondent?

I am pretty sure it was Carl Cameron.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 06:24 AM
 
Location: Texas
26,599 posts, read 11,132,986 times
Reputation: 6101
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7 View Post
I am pretty sure it was Carl Cameron.
Ron Paul said it was not a big deal, plus Cameron is a hack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
71,663 posts, read 83,230,487 times
Reputation: 41495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Ron Paul said it was not a big deal, plus Cameron is a hack.
another reason we should all learn to take things said or how things appear with t grain of salt.

example: don't beleive what you hear: one of our golf course restaurants is due to close the end of the month: everyone is upset: the reason< depending on who you beleive. Everyone who has commented knows the answer, because they have inside info: one person said the leasee is dieing of cancer: one says the landlord has put the rent so high the restaurant can't stay in businees, another knows it is his diabetis. (spelling) according to his daughther this morning: 1-he has had a couple of bouts with cancer (no he is not dieing) he has had other health problems and he has decided he can do better by simply doing catering. Lesson learned, not to the extreme of Paul/Perry but we all have to learn not to believe what we hear. Someone said pictures don't lie: my father told me years ago: believe nothing you hear and about 1/2 of what you see and that was before tech took over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,314 posts, read 39,488,977 times
Reputation: 7107
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7 View Post
According to a certain news correspondent who was at the debate, this exchange was less than friendly. Evidently, Perry was really letting Ron Paul have it. Ron Paul was going after Perry pretty hard in the debate though so fair is fair.
According to Paul himself, that correspondent would be a liar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 12:06 PM
 
8,758 posts, read 8,842,430 times
Reputation: 1428
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
According to Paul himself, that correspondent would be a liar.

I highly doubt Ron Paul would admit to getting his butt chewed and would want to make it 'no big deal'. I wasn't there and the correspondent was. I also don't really care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. | Please obey Forum Rules | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top