Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, it's not my opinion, it's a fact. The author works for a very conservative organization and is using data that is a year old to predict an election that will take place in 9 months. .
.
So that's your defense for posting an inaccurate article, that other people do the same thing? Sounds like 5th grade reasoning to me.
How do you know it's inaccurate. It's accurate going off of the data for 12 months which is a long period. Because you don't like it, doesn't make it inaccurate. Don't get your knickers in a knot over it...lol.
You posted the article and it's title without comment. That's something that continues to intrigue me. People post things and have no interest in the topic, nothing to add. Why post it then? I'm not just drawing attention to you, but it's a general problem on discussion forums. So, the issue interested you enough to start the discussion ... what are your thoughts? Thanks.
This site is for information, right? It is to give people information they might not have seen. Some of the comments people post, I could live as well without. Some I don't even really read, just the articles. Wow you people are really scared.
How do you know it's inaccurate. It's accurate going off of the data for 12 months which is a long period. Because you don't like it, doesn't make it inaccurate. Don't get your knickers in a knot over it...lol.
Polling information from a year ago has little relevance on an election that will take place in 9 months. If you want to use your logic, polling information that was 21 months before the 08 election would have predicted that Obama would not have won. Most Americans probably didn't even know who Obama was 21 months before the 08 election. A few months ago Cain was leading in the polls.
We all have opinions, but it would be best to basethem on the her and now than on the past. Until there is a Official GOP Candidate runing against Obama it is impossible to even guess what the number will be in the end. Based on the lack of support amoung GOP voters for one clear candidate and on the fact that few Paul supporters will vote for any of the other remaining candidates I would say if there is a landslide win it will be Obama getting it, see how easy it is to make predictions. Let's see who the GOP candidate will be and then we can start talking turkey
I didn't write the aritcle, or provide any of the information. I didn't even say what I thought of it...did I? I agree with some of it, I don't so much with others, but who knows?
It must have hit a sensitive spot with a few on here, because they are really getting twisted over it...lol.
I didn't write the aritcle, or provide any of the information. I didn't even say what I thought of it...did I? I agree with some of it, I don't so much with others, but who knows?
It must have hit a sensitive spot with a few on here, because they are really getting twisted over it...lol.
No, but you posted it and that usually implies that the poster agrees with the posting.
Did not bother me in the least, I say the same thing with most polls, especially this early in the game, one step at a time, first someone has to earn the right to good toe to toe with the sitting President by beating out the rest of the field. Then we can speculate based on real candidates and their issues and ideas.
Including the Washington Examiner. Believe me, they throw their crap paper on my driveway every morning.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.