Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Two guys graduate from Harvard Law School with high marks.
One goes to Wall St and forms a company specializing in leveraged buy-outs that throw thousands of Americans out of work while he rakes in the cash.
One goes to Chicago to advocate on behalf of disadvantaged Americans.
Both are now campaigning for president.
Which one will better represent your interests? Which one will work harder for corporate interests?
One rewarded hard work and competence. One rewarded and advocated laziness and incompetence, by taking from the hard working and successful. Who someone votes for says alot about their values and integrity...or lack of same.
Two guys graduate from Harvard Law School with high marks.
One goes to Wall St and forms a company specializing in leveraged buy-outs that throw thousands of Americans out of work while he rakes in the cash.
One goes to Chicago to advocate on behalf of disadvantaged Americans.
Both are now campaigning for president.
Which one will better represent your interests? Which one will work harder for corporate interests?
Oh, that's easy. The one who has created jobs, not the one who throws people out of work, (8.2% unemployment), Steal their money ($15trillion in debt) and wallow in corruption (Fast and Furious).
You posted an idiotic topic and got the thoughtful response it deserved. Bye.
So, you really don't have anything to say. You just want to toss out another juvenile insult. If, like you claim, it's idiotic, you should have no problem pointing out the idiocy. But the truth is that you can't.
It's tough to say anything real when you know you're on the wrong side, isn't it...
Two guys graduate from Harvard Law School with high marks.
One goes to Wall St and forms a company specializing in leveraged buy-outs that throw thousands of Americans out of work while he rakes in the cash.
One goes to Chicago to advocate on behalf of disadvantaged Americans.
Both are now campaigning for president.
Which one will better represent your interests? Which one will work harder for corporate interests?
I think it's a trick question.
Is the answer Ron Paul?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
