Third woman loses creditability defending Obama (Hillary Clinton, speech, terrorist, claims)

[petch751]

Are you noticing that this is the 3rd woman who has lost credibility trying to take the heat off Obama?

Susan Rice (Sept 16):
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice was the face of the Obama administration's inaccurate information on the Sept. 11 Benghazi attacks. She went on 5 different shows saying the Benghazi attack was because of a video and it was not a terrorist attack.

Hillary Clinton:
The Obama administration has taken fire in recent weeks over its original claims that the attack resulted from a spontaneous protest in front of the consulate, stemming from outrage over the anti-Islamic film. She now claims "The buck stops with her"

Candy Crawley:
We all know the fiasco last night .. referring to Obama speech in the rose garden. Obama's explanation is nothing but post-facto rationalization. Crowley's intervention, which she effectively admitted after the debate was wrong, was as offensive for its error on the facts as it was for its partisanship.

Three down... Next?

[jeffpv]

A woman lost her ability to attain credit? Late credit card payment, perhaps?

[Gal from the South]

Originally Posted by petch751

Are you noticing that this is the 3rd woman who has lost credibility trying to take the heat off Obama?

Susan Rice (Sept 16):
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice was the face of the Obama administration's inaccurate information on the Sept. 11 Benghazi attacks. She went on 5 different shows saying the Benghazi attack was because of a video and it was not a terrorist attack.

Hillary Clinton:
The Obama administration has taken fire in recent weeks over its original claims that the attack resulted from a spontaneous protest in front of the consulate, stemming from outrage over the anti-Islamic film. She now claims "The buck stops with her"

Candy Crawley:
We all know the fiasco last night .. referring to Obama speech in the rose garden. Obama's explanation is nothing but post-facto rationalization. Crowley's intervention, which she effectively admitted after the debate was wrong, was as offensive for its error on the facts as it was for its partisanship.

Three down... Next?

You can add Stephanie Cutter to that list, too. (Not that she really had any before, though.)

[seeriously]

They lost their credibility to who? You? All three are quite credible, admirable, smart, respected, etc.... Credibility is in the eye of the beholder.

[bluesjuke]

And Liars are in the eye of the Truth.