Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-19-2012, 09:54 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

Top Democrats, including Democratic Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, had pledged prior to the 2012 Democratic convention not to raise money from special interests, corporations, and to cap individual donations at $100,000.

It appears corporate funds were spent on the Democratic National Convention.......this gathering of leftists relied on at least $5 million in corporate donations, despite repeated pledges by top party officials only to use money raised from individuals,” according to Michael Biesecker of The Associated Press.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz has remained silent. Biesecker posted a follow up column yesterday afternoon where he quoted Ms. Schultz saying, “I haven’t seen the report, and I’m not familiar with the details of it…you have to speak to the host committee.”

Biesecker indicated that the report listed that “donations were also accepted from charities funded by corporations, such as $100,000 from the Xerox Foundation. Also not subject to the Democrats’ ban on corporate donations were law firms, such as the $100,000 donated by McGuire Woods LLP. In addition to being one of the South’s largest law firms, McGuire’s consulting subsidiary employs dozens of registered state and federal lobbyists. More modest checks came from the American Financial Services Association, which represents credit card and financial companies, and the senior group AARP. Both are registered as entities that lobby the federal government.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2012, 11:16 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
Liberals =
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2012, 11:20 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,478,891 times
Reputation: 9440
Apparently they realize they have to deal with reality. I`m sure you`ve heard about the Citizens United SC ruling. Scandal of the year? I think not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 10:57 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
Apparently they realize they have to deal with reality. I`m sure you`ve heard about the Citizens United SC ruling. Scandal of the year? I think not.

So why did they PLEDGE they wouldn't?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top