Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
no, keep the electoral college. otherwise a few population centers will decide who is president in the end. personally i dont want LA, chicago, new york, and san francisco telling me who the president is going to be.
I have never liked the electoral college system. Truthfully, it makes no sense to me.
With everything being computerized these days, there's no reason for every vote not to count. Plus counting votes would encourage people to vote. My state is RED so really, there's no reason for me to waste my time and gas.
It is an antiquated system that needs to go. I sincerely hope Romney wins the popular vote and Obama the electoral college as to see heads explode and finally a consensus in reforming the Constitution.
no, keep the electoral college. otherwise a few population centers will decide who is president in the end. personally i dont want LA, chicago, new york, and san francisco telling me who the president is going to be.
^^^This is the reason we need to keep the electoral college.
no, keep the electoral college. otherwise a few population centers will decide who is president in the end. personally i dont want LA, chicago, new york, and san francisco telling me who the president is going to be.
True, in fact, if the electoral college concept was applied to CA initiatives, say by county..... oh SORRY, I was DREAMING!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.