Why did Obama & Joe Biden get more time in each of the 3 Debates?

[wnewberry22]

Originally Posted by A_Lexus

The President and Vice President of the United States SHOULD get more time over a couple of unelected energized mopes trying to steal the election. Romney and Ryan are trying to deceive the public to suck in votes with vague, empty rhetoric, from a party which gave us Dubya, and doesn't have a record of success.

I overwhelmingly prefer the more substantive responses from our President and Vice-President, not the eventual losers.

I've started to notice that this poster puts up some of the most profoundly idiotic rantings I've ever seen.

1). Both Romney and Ryan either were, or currently are elected officials.
2). Your candidate ran on LITERALLY nothing substantive in 2008 with exception to vague notions of hope, change, pixie dust, puppy farts, and unicorn horns yet you criticize Romney/Ryan for what you deem to be the same thing.
3). Your party gave us Jimmy Carter, Andrew Johnson, and James Buchanan among other turds with shat records.
4). If you prefer substantive responses you would have voted for McCain in 2008 unless vague notions of hope and change are what you regard as answers of substance.
5) Your candidate has shown that he is incapable of doing this job...his numbers are laughable at best...he doesn't understand the economy or our fiscal situation one bit...and he doesn't give a damn about poor people yet he has managed to convince millions of morons out there that he does under this transparent guise of altruism designed to buy votes and keep the dependent, dependent...the poor, poor...and the hungry, hungry.......There are reasons that you don't feed stray kittens.

If you actually listened to the debates through some mirror of objectivity you would hear that Romney and Ryan have articulated a plan very clearly. Next time why don't you try getting your debate analysis from an organ other than daily kos, mojo, or some other liberal rag populated with writers who do not know their ass from a hole in the ground. Furthermore, your inability to comprehend a plan that is as clear as day doesn't correlate to their being no plan.......however it does correlate to something. Lets see if you can figure out what that is.

Based on the content of your previous posts, I'm going to assume not.

[countrylv22]

I agree with your post regarding the poster "A_Lexus" it seems that he is on the Obama payroll

Thank you for your contribution

Originally Posted by wnewberry22

I've started to notice that this poster puts up some of the most profoundly idiotic rantings I've ever seen.

1). Both Romney and Ryan either were, or currently are elected officials.
2). Your candidate ran on LITERALLY nothing substantive in 2008 with exception to vague notions of hope, change, pixie dust, puppy farts, and unicorn horns yet you criticize Romney/Ryan for what you deem to be the same thing.
3). Your party gave us Jimmy Carter, Andrew Johnson, and James Buchanan among other turds with shat records.
4). If you prefer substantive responses you would have voted for McCain in 2008 unless vague notions of hope and change are what you regard as answers of substance.
5) Your candidate has shown that he is incapable of doing this job...his numbers are laughable at best...he doesn't understand the economy or our fiscal situation one bit...and he doesn't give a damn about poor people yet he has managed to convince millions of morons out there that he does under this transparent guise of altruism designed to buy votes and keep the dependent, dependent...the poor, poor...and the hungry, hungry.......There are reasons that you don't feed stray kittens.

If you actually listened to the debates through some mirror of objectivity you would hear that Romney and Ryan have articulated a plan very clearly. Next time why don't you try getting your debate analysis from an organ other than daily kos, mojo, or some other liberal rag populated with writers who do not know their ass from a hole in the ground. Furthermore, your inability to comprehend a plan that is as clear as day doesn't correlate to their being no plan.......however it does correlate to something. Lets see if you can figure out what that is.

Based on the content of your previous posts, I'm going to assume not.

[countrylv22]

Originally Posted by Savoir Faire

Romney and Ryan have nothing to say except Obama sucks.

Obama is full of it, but at least he offers some specifics.

Like the $16 TRILLION in the RED!!

Or like the horrible unemployment/underemployed rate, the REAL one not the one
that takes out people giving up looking for a job.
The REAL unemployment rate is much higher than
the one released.
People who give up looking for a job, because they have been out of work
for so long.

Like Joe Biden said, the American people have been buried for the last 4 years!!!


I do NOT want a community organizer for President, it takes a lot more to do the job!

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by wnewberry22

I've started to notice that this poster puts up some of the most profoundly idiotic rantings I've ever seen.

1). Both Romney and Ryan either were, or currently are elected officials.
2). Your candidate ran on LITERALLY nothing substantive in 2008 with exception to vague notions of hope, change, pixie dust, puppy farts, and unicorn horns yet you criticize Romney/Ryan for what you deem to be the same thing.
3). Your party gave us Jimmy Carter, Andrew Johnson, and James Buchanan among other turds with shat records.
4). If you prefer substantive responses you would have voted for McCain in 2008 unless vague notions of hope and change are what you regard as answers of substance.
5) Your candidate has shown that he is incapable of doing this job...his numbers are laughable at best...he doesn't understand the economy or our fiscal situation one bit...and he doesn't give a damn about poor people yet he has managed to convince millions of morons out there that he does under this transparent guise of altruism designed to buy votes and keep the dependent, dependent...the poor, poor...and the hungry, hungry.......There are reasons that you don't feed stray kittens.

If you actually listened to the debates through some mirror of objectivity you would hear that Romney and Ryan have articulated a plan very clearly. Next time why don't you try getting your debate analysis from an organ other than daily kos, mojo, or some other liberal rag populated with writers who do not know their ass from a hole in the ground. Furthermore, your inability to comprehend a plan that is as clear as day doesn't correlate to their being no plan.......however it does correlate to something. Lets see if you can figure out what that is.

Based on the content of your previous posts, I'm going to assume not.

I'm guessing that 'mirror of objectivity' means that Romney is always right and Obama is always wrong.

Please - you think the Republican party hasn't foisted on us it's fair share of losers?

Perhaps more people would have voted for McCain if he hadn't dug his own grave with Sarah Palin ~ who, I am SURE, that you love.

[Factsplease]

Perhaps if Romney was more polite and knew when to shut his mouth, the moderators wouldn't feel the need to keep telling him when to do so. Bullying the mod and the POTUS isn't going to get you more talk time, but apparently it gets the votes of the weak-minded and ignorant...so I guess it all worked out in Romney's favor. Why complain?

[countrylv22]

Originally Posted by Fleet

Obama, He does? Like what... "I have a plan?" Or, "Forward?"

Its more like going backwards....


"Hope, Change & Forward"= $16 TRILLION in the RED, and LIES, LIES & MORE LIES



And a US Ambassador DEAD in addition to other Americans