Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-14-2013, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,274,753 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
just one problem which was pointed out on another thread: her age. She is already in her 60s. My guess, even if I was a supporter of liberalism, she is not the one to run our country. She is too little, too late.
She wouldn't be as old as Reagan was when he inaugurated as president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2013, 10:04 PM
 
8,017 posts, read 5,886,288 times
Reputation: 9706
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
She wouldn't be as old as Reagan was when he inaugurated as president.
Believe it or not, Reagan had a LOT less miles on him. Hillary looks like she's been ridden hard and put away wet more than once. She'll be 69 in 2016, but honestly, her "real" age is probably somewhere north of 72.

Of course, if Hillary did win, maybe SHE could play "hide the cigar" with some young (male?) intern. As they say, Karma's a.............Nancy Pelosi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 04:59 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 105,032,505 times
Reputation: 49250
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
She wouldn't be as old as Reagan was when he inaugurated as president.
I was referring to the comment made about her not being ready yet, so she would have to wait til 2024. At that time she would be older than Reagan was when he was elected. He was 69, just a few days under 70 when he was inaugurated. She would be about 75. I am not talking about 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 05:02 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 105,032,505 times
Reputation: 49250
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
The right has gone so far to the right that even right wing idol Reagan would be far too Liberal for them, so by those standards ANYONE and EVERYONE is divisive.
Are we talking about Reagan here or are we talking about Warren versus Hillary? I hope you do not get to dizzy from all your spinning!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,405,267 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
Believe it or not, Reagan had a LOT less miles on him. Hillary looks like she's been ridden hard and put away wet more than once. She'll be 69 in 2016, but honestly, her "real" age is probably somewhere north of 72.

Of course, if Hillary did win, maybe SHE could play "hide the cigar" with some young (male?) intern. As they say, Karma's a.............Nancy Pelosi.
A agree with this. Joe Biden is 5 years older but seems much more energized yet relaxed to me. Did you see the study recently that found that stress causes aging? Hillary has been through one stress-fest after another in her life. Plus as Sen. and then presidential candidate she was known as a 20-hour-day, 'get the details right' type.

This is why I still think she might not run. As long as everyone believes that she's running, she and Bill have ways to monetize that.
Hillary Clinton's Lucrative Goldman Sachs Speaking Gigs | National Review Online
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 10:14 AM
 
Location: The #1 sunshine state, Arizona.
12,169 posts, read 17,675,873 times
Reputation: 64106
Elizabeth Warren, the pseudo American Indian. I have high cheek bones, maybe I should work that to my advantage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 105,032,505 times
Reputation: 49250
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElizaTeal View Post
Elizabeth Warren, the pseudo American Indian. I have high cheek bones, maybe I should work that to my advantage.
and I have a deep voice, big shoulders and when I had my stint the doctor said, it would likely hold better and have less scar tissue than many women, because by arteries are larger, more like mens: maybe I should decide to have a sex change or just claim I am a guy!!! I am also tall, but not that tall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2013, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,274,753 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
Believe it or not, Reagan had a LOT less miles on him. Hillary looks like she's been ridden hard and put away wet more than once. She'll be 69 in 2016, but honestly, her "real" age is probably somewhere north of 72.

Of course, if Hillary did win, maybe SHE could play "hide the cigar" with some young (male?) intern. As they say, Karma's a.............Nancy Pelosi.
Huh? Reagan looked like a raisin when he was elected president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2013, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,274,753 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
I was referring to the comment made about her not being ready yet, so she would have to wait til 2024. At that time she would be older than Reagan was when he was elected. He was 69, just a few days under 70 when he was inaugurated. She would be about 75. I am not talking about 2016.
The amount of things Clinton has done has definitely made her ready for 2016 if she chooses to run again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2013, 09:58 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,833,752 times
Reputation: 22474
Boy -- the left is sure having to scrape the bottom for it's candidates. You guys seriously have no one better?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top