Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary was elected to the Senate from New York, but don't let any facts get in your way. You're on a roll.
If there was any state carpet bagging HC could have won a senate seat it was New York. Voters here a long ago gave up requiring anything of substance from elected officials.
As one recalls the Clinton woman's first term was what it was; and she barely won re-election after again and again promising if sent back to Washington DC again she would serve out the entire term. Well that didn't last when the Clintons saw their chance in 2008 to win the WH. Sadly that AA senator got their first.
The Clintons are a grasping and scheming lot who could teach the Borgia family a thing or two.
You may not like Ed Klein but I'll take him and his connections over your claim of a rumor.
Of course my second response had to do with your statement, but you choose to claim it invalid because you consider Warren a valid candidate. It's a weak debating technique.
As for the bold, what connections ????? Have you seen Ed Klien's articles before this one, they all read like gossip column
As for your second post, Again, you were claiming that Democrats didnt have a unified consensus on Warren. A claim i never made. My post simply said what you see as week is not the same as what someone else sees as weak.
THat isnt a week debating technique, its just truth. people have different opinions of individuals you know ? Or did you really believe that since you thought someone was weak, that meant everyone had to agree with you ?
I seriously doubt the truth behind the story. Would he back her over Hillary heck I don't know and it seems to be known that the Obama's and Clintons are not great friends but I doubt Ed Klien has privy to any such information and I doubt Elizabeth will even consider running.
I might like to think he would support her, that would probably be the nail in her coffin the way things are going, but it just doesn't seem likely.
The source for the bold is a previous Klein article, LOL.
Well we might be able assess Klein in part by what happens in 2016. If Hillary runs, and Barack and Michelle are right there campaigning for her, we'll know that Klein was woefully wrong if not outright fabricating. If Barack and Michelle are nowhere to be found, then Klein called it.
Thats a correlation causation fallacy. there could be a million reasons why they arent on the campaign trail in 2016. Not being their doesnt prove Klein, right. the only thing that proves him right is him actually being right. one of the Obama's coming out and saying they dont support the Clintons.
Let's be real: hilary a more corporatist, centrist version of Obama. She got blindsided in 2008 because she didn't realize how liberal the base had become, whereas Obama (and Edwards) did. Now she's moving to the left on some issues, while staying in the middle on others. She's out here apologizing to Wall Street brokers and saying they've been demonized. That is pathetic pandering.
Elizabeth Warren is a hard-working do it yourselfer who stands up
to the big money powerbrokers and cares about the little guy a
hell of a lot more than Hillary Clinton does.
Who rides on the backs of real American Indians.....supports the little guy? Like Obama has done? No thanks.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.