Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, of course I knew she actually didn't do the driving. She sat in the back, with her server, deleting personal emails.
And of course she had democratic operatives working in advance at all her stops. She wouldn't want to accidentally mosey into a nest of right wing vipers, now would she?
I guess that all means that you are not Gruber'd and just like the Razzle-Dazzle Scam.
Different strokes for different folks - it makes the world go 'round.
The Benghazi cover up deal was pretty a game killer for me. That was small potatoes compared to the deliberate Email server scam and all the LIES connected to that. NOBODY wipes personal servers when they know it's against the ethics and laws UNLESS there is plenty they want to hide. And then there is all the Clinton Foundation business while she was Secretary of State.
Why exactly would anyone want to elect such a person to a position of power in the USA?
There is NO agenda that is worth that. She has proven herself to be totally unworthy.
So we have someone drinking too much water, another person reading things during a filibuster and someone getting worked up at a question compared to deliberate lying and breaking law. Not to mention the miss managment of Benghazi.
I guess that all means that you are not Gruber'd and just like the Razzle-Dazzle Scam.
Different strokes for different folks - it makes the world go 'round.
The Benghazi cover up deal was pretty a game killer for me. That was small potatoes compared to the deliberate Email server scam and all the LIES connected to that. NOBODY wipes personal servers when they know it's against the ethics and laws UNLESS there is plenty they want to hide. And then there is all the Clinton Foundation business while she was Secretary of State.
Why exactly would anyone want to elect such a person to a position of power in the USA?
There is NO agenda that is worth that. She has proven herself to be totally unworthy.
Pretty much thought that would be your whole take. No surprises there. I on the other hand consider her a very moral person with high ideals. She is also a very shrewd politician with a whole lotta backing and support. She's managed to stand tall and above the fray while there are right wing groups formed for the express purpose to hate Hillary.
Go on the republican Committee web sight and what do you see? "Stop Hillary!!!" Nothing about what the republicans want to do for the country or what they like. Just what they hate. And they hate Hillary Clinton. Here's the link. https://www.gop.com/
Getting back to the title of the thread, Clinton's strategy to defeat the republicans, She's presenting herself as the everyman's personal representative in Washington. She started with the low key ride to Iowa.
You on the other hand are playing the only strategy the republicans have, which is the moral turpitude factor. You're just painting her scarlet and will repeat her litany of Republican sins over and over and over until January 20th, 2017. If ever there was a true, one trick pony, the republicans are it. Especially this election cycle.
But at least we now know what the whole republican strategy is. Stop Hillary. Just go on the official GOP site. See if you can find what's the republican plan to do for the nation............nada, it's not there. Nowhere to be found.
Pretty much thought that would be your whole take. No surprises there. I on the other hand consider her a very moral person with high ideals. She is also a very shrewd politician with a whole lotta backing and support. She's managed to stand tall and above the fray while there are right wing groups formed for the express purpose to hate Hillary.
Go on the republican Committee web sight and what do you see? "Stop Hillary!!!" Nothing about what the republicans want to do for the country or what they like. Just what they hate. And they hate Hillary Clinton. Here's the link. https://www.gop.com/
Getting back to the title of the thread, Clinton's strategy to defeat the republicans, She's presenting herself as the everyman's personal representative in Washington. She started with the low key ride to Iowa.
You on the other hand are playing the only strategy the republicans have, which is the moral turpitude factor. You're just painting her scarlet and will repeat her litany of Republican sins over and over and over until January 20th, 2017. If ever there was a true, one trick pony, the republicans are it. Especially this election cycle.
But at least we now know what the whole republican strategy is. Stop Hillary. Just go on the official GOP site. See if you can find what's the republican plan to do for the nation............nada, it's not there. Nowhere to be found.
Since Hillary is the heir apparent and has exceptional high negatives it is a good early strategy. You know if Jeb was the republican nominee the left would be lining up with "anyone but Bush" campaign.
Every rich politicians tries to present themselves as the "common man". Hillary has been in politics way too long for people to believe that. Rubio could pull it off since he at least isn't worth millions of dollars, same with walker and Rand since he still donates his time to do eye care for the less fortunate (his original proffesion). Jeb would have a hard time selling the common man, but if he acts anything like his brother it would be more believable than Hillary.
Since Hillary is the heir apparent and has exceptional high negatives it is a good early strategy. You know if Jeb was the republican nominee the left would be lining up with "anyone but Bush" campaign.
Every rich politicians tries to present themselves as the "common man". Hillary has been in politics way too long for people to believe that. Rubio could pull it off since he at least isn't worth millions of dollars, same with walker and Rand since he still donates his time to do eye care for the less fortunate (his original proffesion). Jeb would have a hard time selling the common man, but if he acts anything like his brother it would be more believable than Hillary.
Jeb could do well selling himself as the competent Executive manager. Sorta in between the semi socialist agenda of Hillary and the incompetent, half cocked, right wing. I think I already said somewhere that our nation is safe and secure with either Hillary or Bush. Anyone else and we get the Cruz effect of sporadic ignition and cheap political drama.
I'm looking at Clinton wins, democrats regain the majority in the Senate and moderate republicans gain seats from tea party republicans in the house. Hopefully the tea party drama queens will have to go sit in the corner and the adults can run the show.
It is more likely I'll be struck by commet than the dems holding 60+ seats in the senate.
I would put the odds of hillary winning at 55% at this point, the senate being controlled by the dems at 25% at most. Not very many open seats for any sort of movement. If seats become open like they were in 2014 the odds increase. But sitting senators in both parties rarely lose.
60 seats is probably a little bold but I think they will retake the majority.
The Iowa video was an absolute embarrassment. Both the media and the politicians are swimming in the same toilet, and here's the biggest turd in the bowl:
none of the republicans are new. we know them well and they scare the hell out of us and fear for america.
Compare to Hillary, they are new and younger on age and in the political arena.
nothing more scary than Hillary and her rapist husband back in the WH....who are they going to name WH spokesperson Bill Cosby?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.