Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's clear from the current Republican line up that they don't have anyone with even a remote chance of winning, so wouldn't it better for them to just not nominate a candidate? They should just sit this election out and let a nonaffiliated candidate challenge Hillary. A conservative candidate without the Republican stink on him or her would have a better chance of winning anyways. What do you think?
This thread has proven prophetic. The Republican standard bearer is about to be a) a non Republican with an unstable personality, b) a crazy Teajadist whose main claim to fame before running for president was shutting the government down or c) a "leightwieght chocker" with no achievements who can't even get through a friendly Fox news interview without sweating bullets.
Come on GOP -- seriously? This is the best you can do? You should show some real leadership and admit you're too much of a mess at the moment to even mount a presidential campaign. Sit '16 out.
The problem is that both Democrats running have the Democrat "stink" on them. That is the stink of lying, corruption, voter fraud, 'open borders' (letting anyone enter the country is viewed as 'compassion,' even if they are here to blow us up).
Both Sanders and Hillary are socialists, though by a different name; Hillary calls herself a "progressive," while Sanders is more honest and calls himself a "democratic socialist," which if I recall is what Hitler claimed to be.
At least two Republican running are Constituitionalists, which means they believe in the Constitution as written, and do not believe it to be a "living document" (thank you, Woodrow Wilson). Neither Democrat running believes in the Constitution, although they will lie and tell you they do. The Democrat Party long ago abandoned belief in the Constitution and became a Party of statists. They believe in "Social Justice," which is just another term for socialism; i.e., individual Liberty is less important than the interest of the collective whole, and the government decides where the line is drawn.
It's clear from the current Republican line up that they don't have anyone with even a remote chance of winning, so wouldn't it better for them to just not nominate a candidate? They should just sit this election out and let a nonaffiliated candidate challenge Hillary. A conservative candidate without the Republican stink on him or her would have a better chance of winning anyways. What do you think?
It's clear from the current Republican line up that they don't have anyone with even a remote chance of winning, so wouldn't it better for them to just not nominate a candidate? They should just sit this election out and let a nonaffiliated candidate challenge Hillary. A conservative candidate without the Republican stink on him or her would have a better chance of winning anyways. What do you think?
I think Donald Trump has a decent chance of winning, not sure about the other candidates though.
Actually I am going to go out on a limb here and say that Trump would win this thing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Democrat "stink"
