Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wall Street Journal headline: Clinton Emailed Classified Material, Review Says
Now that HRC has been proven to have committed criminal acts, and proven (once again) to be a liar, will the Dems finally go to the bench for someone not so tainted? Or will they go down with the Hillary ship?
Wow, looks like the Dem bench is a bunch of clowns.
Wall Street Journal headline: Clinton Emailed Classified Material, Review Says
Now that HRC has been proven to have committed criminal acts, and proven (once again) to be a liar, will the Dems finally go to the bench for someone not so tainted? Or will they go down with the Hillary ship?
Wow, looks like the Dem bench is a bunch of clowns.
Too bad you didn't actually read past the headline of that WSJ article:
The State Department said on Friday that it didn’t believe any of the emails Mrs. Clinton sent during her time in office contained any classified material.
“To our knowledge, none of them needed to be classified at the time,” said Mark Toner, a department spokesman. Mr. Toner acknowledged that the department had determined that many of her emails now contained classified information but believed it was unclassified at the time.
It’s not uncommon that something that you’re sending now on an unclassified network could in later years or later months be deemed to be classified either because the passage of time made it so or because events on the ground have borne out.”
Too bad you didn't actually read past the headline of that WSJ article:
The State Department said on Friday that it didn’t believe any of the emails Mrs. Clinton sent during her time in office contained any classified material.
“To our knowledge, none of them needed to be classified at the time,” said Mark Toner, a department spokesman. Mr. Toner acknowledged that the department had determined that many of her emails now contained classified information but believed it was unclassified at the time.
It’s not uncommon that something that you’re sending now on an unclassified network could in later years or later months be deemed to be classified either because the passage of time made it so or because events on the ground have borne out.”
Too bad you didn't actually read past the headline of that WSJ article:
The State Department said on Friday that it didn’t believe any of the emails Mrs. Clinton sent during her time in office contained any classified material.
“To our knowledge, none of them needed to be classified at the time,” said Mark Toner, a department spokesman. Mr. Toner acknowledged that the department had determined that many of her emails now contained classified information but believed it was unclassified at the time.
It’s not uncommon that something that you’re sending now on an unclassified network could in later years or later months be deemed to be classified either because the passage of time made it so or because events on the ground have borne out.”
Vote for Hillary, she will DELETE all of our problems.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
