Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
. Because all those 18 to 45 year old muslim males from that region are peace loving pacifists. I mean it should be obvious, they come from a region that specializes in peace.
Hillary is part of the problem, not the solution.
Amen. We should be deporting all from the region on student visas, now, btw. With no exceptions and no reentry allowed.
An analyst on FOX was talking about this. He said part of the problem is the Sunni/Shia divide: Council on Foreign Relations
The US can't go "all in" because that would convince some factions that are just sitting on the sidelines now that this is their war too and they would jump in. It would become much much worse.
I actually agree with you on importing the problem. That is one of the things that she said last night that I disagree with. I do acknowledge that we have contributed to the problems there and so bear some responsibility, but I think we have to make the uncomfortable decision not to allow refugees into the country. As much as I don't like stating that (on moral grounds), we have to accept the reality.
To be honest, we really are responsible for this. There's always the risk of radicalized Muslims entering our countries(there would be thorough screening), but really, we do have a responsibility to accept at least some refugees. It's not going to be on the scale of Europe by any means.
At the same time, we really need to stop a lot of our military engagements... Getting entangled in superfluous fights will lead to further destabilization... Instead we need need some Arabic countries to expand their operations because let's be honest, it isn't always America's duty to fight the wars. If there is a terrorist attack on U.S. soil, there'll definitely be red lashback, although at least it looks like warmongering Lindsey Graham is done for.
The fact is our options for direct action against ISIS/ISIL are fairly limited because it's not a sovereign nation, but a radical movement that operates in several countries far away from the U.S.
Remember, invading Iraq is what enabled these groups to thrive, so we need to be very careful about how we approach this issue. Another invasion could just create and inspire more terrorism.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
