Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, however, both are perfectly legal documents and depending on how they are used could constitute fraud. If he used these documents with the intent to defraud then it is illegal, but to have them in your possession isn't illegal.
Regarding the bolded, exactly.
Barry Soetoro would have actually had to have his identity legally reverted back to Barack Obama after the Soetoro divorce in the summer of 1980, though. There's no evidence that ever happened.
I'm not talking about Indonesian citizenship. I'm talking about the dual citizenship the Obama campaign admitted he was born with via his alleged birth father:
"When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children."
I'm not talking about Indonesian citizenship. I'm talking about the dual citizenship the Obama campaign admitted he was born with via his alleged birth father:
Barry Soetoro would have actually had to have his identity legally reverted back to Barack Obama after the Soetoro divorce in the summer of 1980, though. There's no evidence that ever happened.
Yes, however, if the adoption took place in Hawaii then birth records after the adoption would have changed to reflect the adoptive father as the birth father. If Obama's mother had the original birth record in her possession then Barack Obama had access to both birth certificates. He then could have used the original certificate and act as if no adoption ever took place. What I find interesting is that if the adoption took place in Hawaii, because it is policy for the adoptive father to be added to the birth certificate, why didn't the birth certificate show Soetoro as the father when there was such a stink about Obama's birth location. The only thing I can think of was he was never legally adopted, then again why go by the name Barry Soetoro.
as i pointed out earlier, obama is the third president to use his step-father's surname without having been adopted ( clinton and ford are the others ).
Yes, however, if the adoption took place in Hawaii then birth records after the adoption would have changed to reflect the adoptive father as the birth father. If Obama's mother had the original birth record in her possession then Barack Obama had access to both birth certificates. He then could have used the original certificate and act as if no adoption ever took place. What I find interesting is that if the adoption took place in Hawaii, because it is policy for the adoptive father to be added to the birth certificate, why didn't the birth certificate show Soetoro as the father when there was such a stink about Obama's birth location. The only thing I can think of was he was never legally adopted, then again why go by the name Barry Soetoro.
If he hadn't been legally adopted, he wouldn't have been indirectly referred to as Lolo's child in the Hawaiian Court Soetoro divorce document. Maya was also indirectly referred to as Lolo's child in that document, as well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
