Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For many attending Trump's rallies, it may be the first time they've heard him speak publicly. So what - he repeats pretty much the same stump speech every rally. So do all the other candidates. Just because you've heard it before doesn't mean others haven't.
No WAY did the audience look bored. They were the most vocal and enthusiastic I've seen in a while. And while I DO listen to every one of his rallies, I'm not bored at all. Here's the link to his entire speech for anyone interested.
When Hillary Clinton gives a speech she doesn't need a translator to tell us what the hell she's talking about. You don't have to agree with her, but you won't need someone to explain what she just said.
Do you mean the speech where she lied about the ISIS video of Trump? Or the speech where she Blamed Bengahzi on a youtube video? Or the speech where her response about a wiped server is to ask about a dish cloth?
So is it Hillary Clinton that you put up as a better and more honest speaker as Trump? Please go on record and let us know.
He is a great story teller. The people who don't like him also like someone like Hillary who can't say hello without looking down at notes. His ozone piece the other night brought down the house.
He's so DUMB. "bing, bing, bing". "Then I have to take another shower cause my hair doesn't look good".
First of all - hairspray is no longer a culprit for the Ozone layer and hasn't been since the 1980's where the Donald still resides. An argument can be made for the carbon footprint that the newer aerosol's cause - but it's not the ozone layer.
That's what passes for political speech and the lemmings hang onto every word.
His speeches do tend to be train of thought type speeches - definitely not rehearsed or with the aid of a teleprompter. The question is - if Trump is such an insignificant clown - why are you spending so much time transcribing what he says?
Other people do the transcribing; his stream of consciousness speeches can be read all over the web.
When Hillary Clinton gives a speech she doesn't need a translator to tell us what the hell she's talking about. You don't have to agree with her, but you won't need someone to explain what she just said.
Do you mean the speech where she lied about the ISIS video of Trump? Or the speech where she Blamed Bengahzi on a youtube video? Or the speech where her response about a wiped server is to ask about a dish cloth?
So is it Hillary Clinton that you put up as a better and more honest speaker as Trump? Please go on record and let us know.
Can you understand what she says without needing an interpreter? Can she speak in whole sentences? Does she make sense when she speaks? Regardless of whether or not you agree with what she's saying, you can understand it. The same cannot be said for Trump. I always knew Palin was the queen of word salad. Looks like we've found our king.
Can you understand what she says without needing an interpreter? Can she speak in whole sentences? Does she make sense when she speaks? Regardless of whether or not you agree with what she's saying, you can understand it. The same cannot be said for Trump. I always knew Palin was the queen of word salad. Looks like we've found our king.
You still didn't answer question. Are you ashamed to admit who you support?
Nope. I support Bernie Sanders. Who, I might add, is capable of speaking in whole sentences.
And who will you support when the DNC doesn't allow him to be nominated?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.