Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Insult isn't argument. It only means you can't address what was said with logic or fact.
Hillary absolutely will bring out the alligator tears as disarming tool when faced with something she doesn't like but can't avoid. Very similar to insult tactic.
This is hilarious, considering that the content of many of your posts is pure insult, without any foundation. Irony?
I find it humorous that a candidate trying to project an image of a strong woman needs her husband to help her beat Bernie Sanders. If she can't beat Bernie Sanders on her own how is she going to win the General Election. Bill Clinton starts to campaign for her this week.
You can't have it both ways, Hillary.
Hillary also stated that Bill is so good on the economy part so she already admitted not being able to do it on her own.
For me it sounds more that Hillary is playing the women card so Bill can get more interns.
I find it humorous that a candidate trying to project an image of a strong woman needs her husband to help her beat Bernie Sanders.
Bill Clinton, nor the rest of the country found anything humorous when Bill "the Policy Wonk" Clinton put Hillary up front and center as Mrs. Policy Wonk during his 1993 campaign for the presidency. In 1993 Hillary was already known as a major political operative in her own right and appeared without Bill across the country stumping not only for her husband but for major democratic candidates for state and federal office. Back in 1993, Hillary was as big a target for Republican attack ads as Bill, so I think its a bit farfetched to try and claim that Hillary is "standing by her man" to get to the White House. Hillary like her or loather is perfectly capable of getting their on her own although it would be just asinine to argue that Bill standing behind her ain't a bad thing.
But Ronald Reagan did say to vote for him because of his gender.
Hillary Clinton has clearly done this.
I don't think Hillary has told anyone to vote for her because she's a woman. Maybe some of her supporters are for her for this reason, and there has certainly been some funny faux advertisements regarding her gender. But Ronald Reagan attempted to identify with voters, tried to connect with them in various ways, told people he could relate to them, and I see Hillary attempting to identify with voters, and telling voters that she can relate to them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
