Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's called low hanging fruit because there is no demand for it except by those who "care" enough to take time to pick it off tree. Thank you for analogy.
Burnt.
LOL
At least you seem to get the meaning of "analogy".
Clearly, you don't understand "low-hanging fruit", which is simply fruit that is easily picked. Demand is irrelevant.
Note to Hillary lovers, SHE is the one starting this, not anyone else.
And it's all the Clinton hater's fault? Really? Wow, this thread is really quite enlightening and mind blowing... Reading the breath and depth of hypocrisy of Hillary and her supports is like looking at the Grand Canyon. I feel like I've dropped into an alternative universe when I read these threads.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
SHE is not the one starting this. Trump is.
LOL um sure. Trump didn't send the text saying ALL women deserved to be heard while having run a war room against the women who accused her husband on assault. Hypocrite Hillary did. And Hillary called Trump a sexist and is playing the "woman's card" while at the same time sending the person who has the least respect for women (Bill) to campaign for her because she cannot beat Bernie in New Hampshire. Why doesn't she go there herself?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
And ALL abused women do deserve to be heard. Is this something you disagree with? If you agree with that statement, then it doesn't matter who is making the statement.
Trump has made many sexist remarks. Adulterers aren't necessarily sexist.
Since a guy adulterer is hurting some woman at some point by doing it, they are sexist by definition. You can't possibly tell me that an adulterer has respect for women while doing that, can you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
Clinton haters have done a lot of harm. Obama haters have done a lot of harm. Bush haters have done a lot of harm. When hatred and anger is your driving motivation, then harm and destruction tends to be your objective.
I'm not hating anyone, I'm just trying to fathom how someone who a few years ago was running a war room against women trying to speak against Bill is now tweeting that all women should be heard. I'm also trying to fathom how a candidate such as Hillary has flipped-flopped on so many issues (equality for example) is even seriously running today as a Democrat. And I'm trying to fathom how you can support such as person, when there are 300 million other people who can run for President.
Can you please tell me why you would want Hillary to be president in spite of the tons of baggage she has? If you support Bernie, I would vote for him, for example. In fact, I would vote for anyone but Hillary because I don't want 8 years of constant controversy. I don't want 8 years of this: Hillary's email issues again... Hillary blaming the victims (Benghazi)...
Even if I put you on ignore, there are still plenty of people who will correct and refute your partisan attacks.
So what's the point for you?
.
hard to ignore threads that get spammed on the message board too
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
